Nakayama Yusuke, Covassin Tracey, Schatz Philip, Nogle Sally, Kovan Jeff
Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):2000-5. doi: 10.1177/0363546514535901. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
Test-retest reliability is a critical issue in the utility of computer-based neurocognitive assessment paradigms employing baseline and postconcussion tests. Researchers have reported low test-retest reliability for the Immediate Post Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) across an interval of 45 and 50 days.
To re-examine the test-retest reliability of the ImPACT between baseline, 45 days, and 50 days.
Descriptive laboratory study.
Eighty-five physically active college students (51 male, 34 female) volunteered for this study. Participants completed the ImPACT as well as a 15-item memory test at baseline, 45 days, and 50 days. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for ImPACT composite scores, and change scores were calculated using reliable change indices (RCIs) and regression-based methods (RBMs) at 80% and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
The respective ICCs for baseline to day 45, day 45 to day 50, baseline to day 50, and overall were as follows: verbal memory (0.76, 0.69, 0.65, and 0.78), visual memory (0.72, 0.66, 0.60, and 0.74), visual motor (processing) speed (0.87, 0.88, 0.85, and 0.91), and reaction time (0.67, 0.81, 0.71, and 0.80). All ICCs exceeded the threshold value of 0.60 for acceptable test-retest reliability. All cases fell well within the 80% CI for both the RCI and RBM, while 1% to 5% of cases fell outside the 95% CI for the RCI and 1% for the RBM.
Results suggest that the ImPACT is a reliable neurocognitive test battery at 45 and 50 days after the baseline assessment. The current findings agree with those of other reliability studies that have reported acceptable ICCs across 30-day to 1-year testing intervals, and they support the utility of the ImPACT for the multidisciplinary approach to concussion management.
This study suggests that the computerized neurocognitive test battery, ImPACT, is a reliable test for postconcussion serial assessments. However, when managing concussed athletes, the ImPACT should not be used as a stand-alone measure.
重测信度是采用基线测试和脑震荡后测试的计算机化神经认知评估范式效用中的一个关键问题。研究人员报告称,在45天和50天的时间间隔内,即时脑震荡评估和认知测试(ImPACT)的重测信度较低。
重新检验基线、45天和50天之间ImPACT的重测信度。
描述性实验室研究。
85名身体活跃的大学生(51名男性,34名女性)自愿参与本研究。参与者在基线、45天和50天时完成了ImPACT以及一项15项的记忆测试。计算了ImPACT综合得分的组内相关系数(ICC),并使用可靠变化指数(RCI)和基于回归的方法(RBM)在80%和95%置信区间(CI)下计算了变化得分。
从基线到第45天、第45天到第50天、基线到第50天以及总体的各自ICC如下:言语记忆(0.76、0.69、0.65和0.78)、视觉记忆(0.72、0.66、0.60和0.74)、视觉运动(处理)速度(0.87、0.88、0.85和0.91)以及反应时间(0.67、0.81、0.71和0.80)。所有ICC均超过了可接受重测信度的阈值0.60。所有病例在RCI和RBM的80%CI内均完全符合,而1%至5%的病例在RCI的95%CI之外,在RBM的95%CI之外的病例为1%。
结果表明,ImPACT在基线评估后的45天和50天是一种可靠的神经认知测试组合。目前的研究结果与其他可靠性研究一致,这些研究报告了在30天至1年的测试间隔内可接受的ICC,并且支持ImPACT在脑震荡管理多学科方法中的效用。
本研究表明,计算机化神经认知测试组合ImPACT是脑震荡后系列评估的可靠测试。然而,在管理脑震荡运动员时,ImPACT不应作为独立的测量方法使用。