Takaoka Kensuke, Nannya Yasuhito, Shinohara Akihito, Arai Shunya, Nakamura Fumihiko, Kurokawa Mineo
Department of Hematology & Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, 1138655, Japan.
Ann Hematol. 2014 Oct;93(10):1637-44. doi: 10.1007/s00277-014-2093-1. Epub 2014 Jun 8.
The requirement of antifungal prophylaxis has not been established in the chemotherapies for malignant lymphoma. This study was conducted to explore the incidence of invasive fungal diseases (IFD) and their risk factors in patients receiving salvage therapies for malignant lymphoma. We retrospectively analyzed 177 consecutive patients who received these therapies (705 courses in total) at our institute. IFD were observed in 16 courses and the incidence was 2.3 %. A multivariate analysis showed that the factors associated with IFD were primary refractoriness (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 4.22; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.38-13.0; p value = 0.012), two (aOR, 10.5, 95 % CI, 1.20-91.7; p = 0.033) or more (aOR, 26.2; 95 % CI, 3.27-210; p = 0.002) previous treatment lines, and the minimum neutrophil count during the therapies equal to or less than 500/μL (aOR, 9.69; 95 % CI, 1.25-74.9; p = 0.030). Using these factors, we created the IFD scoring model by assigning one point to each of primary refractoriness, two previous treatment lines and treatment that caused neutropenia (≤500/μL minimal neutrophil count) and two points to three or more previous treatment lines. The IFD incidence of lower risk group (IFD score <3) was 0.19 % and that of higher (IFD score ≥3) was 9.0 %. In conclusion, adequate prophylaxis for IFD might be required for patients with primary refractoriness, repeated therapies, or therapies which cause neutropenia. Furthermore, the IFD scoring model of this study underscores the need to account for disease and host factors in determining administration of adequate prophylaxis in salvage treatments for malignant lymphoma.
在恶性淋巴瘤的化疗中,抗真菌预防的必要性尚未明确。本研究旨在探讨接受挽救性治疗的恶性淋巴瘤患者侵袭性真菌病(IFD)的发生率及其危险因素。我们回顾性分析了我院连续177例接受这些治疗的患者(共705个疗程)。在16个疗程中观察到IFD,发生率为2.3%。多因素分析显示,与IFD相关的因素有原发难治性(校正比值比(aOR),4.22;95%置信区间(CI),1.38 - 13.0;p值 = 0.012)、既往有两条(aOR,10.5,95%CI,1.20 - 91.7;p = 0.033)或更多(aOR,26.2;95%CI,3.27 - 210;p = 0.002)治疗线,以及治疗期间最低中性粒细胞计数等于或低于500/μL(aOR,9.69;95%CI,1.25 - 74.9;p = 0.030)。利用这些因素,我们创建了IFD评分模型,对原发难治性、既往两条治疗线和导致中性粒细胞减少(最低中性粒细胞计数≤500/μL)的治疗各赋予1分,对既往三条或更多治疗线赋予2分。低风险组(IFD评分<3)的IFD发生率为0.19%,高风险组(IFD评分≥3)为9.0%。总之,对于原发难治性、重复治疗或导致中性粒细胞减少的患者,可能需要进行充分的IFD预防。此外,本研究的IFD评分模型强调了在确定恶性淋巴瘤挽救性治疗中充分预防措施的给药时,需要考虑疾病和宿主因素。