Kallio-Pulkkinen Soili, Haapea Marianne, Liukkonen Esa, Huumonen Sisko, Tervonen Osmo, Nieminen Miika T
Oral and Maxillofacial radiologist, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital; Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Biostatistician, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014 Jul;118(1):135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Apr 19.
To compare observer performance in the detection of anatomical structures and pathology in panoramic radiographs using a consumer grade display and tablet (3(rd) generation iPad; Cupertino, CA, USA) under suboptimal conditions compared to 6 MegaPixels (6 MP) display under dim lighting conditions.
Thirty panoramic radiographs were selected. All images were blindly evaluated on three displays by two observers with different amounts of experience. Consumer grade display and tablet evaluations were made under approximately 510 lx ambient light and 6MP display evaluations under approx. 16 lx.
The observer performance of an experienced observer did not differ between different displays whereas the less experienced observer performed better with 6MP display than with consumer grade display or tablet.
A dentist with less experience in interpreting panoramic radiographs may be more dependent on the high-quality display used under optimal viewing conditions to detect anatomical structures and pathology compared to a more experienced dentist.
与在昏暗照明条件下的600万像素(6MP)显示器相比,比较在次优条件下使用消费级显示器和平板电脑(第三代iPad;美国加利福尼亚州库比蒂诺)检测全景X线片中解剖结构和病变的观察者表现。
选择30张全景X线片。由两名经验不同的观察者在三种显示器上对所有图像进行盲法评估。消费级显示器和平板电脑的评估在约510勒克斯的环境光下进行,6MP显示器的评估在约16勒克斯下进行。
经验丰富的观察者在不同显示器之间的表现没有差异,而经验较少的观察者在6MP显示器上的表现优于消费级显示器或平板电脑。
与经验更丰富的牙医相比,在解读全景X线片方面经验较少的牙医可能更依赖在最佳观察条件下使用的高质量显示器来检测解剖结构和病变。