Smith R P, Clifton-Hadley F A, Cheney T, Giles M
Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency (AHVLA) - Weybridge, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK.
Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency (AHVLA) - Weybridge, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK.
Vet Parasitol. 2014 Aug 29;204(3-4):111-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.05.022. Epub 2014 May 23.
An average of 70 samples were collected from 80 dairy farms in England and Wales, from cattle, co-grazed sheep, wildlife and farm wastes, to investigate prevalence, potential sources and transmission routes of Cryptosporidium. At least one positive sample was detected on 74 of the farms (92.5%) by IFAT microscopy. The prevalence in cattle was 10.2% (95% CI 9.4-11.1%), with greater prevalences detected in calf samples, especially from those under 1 month (45.1%). Young calves were also more likely to be shedding Cryptosporidium parvum and larger concentrations of oocysts, whereas older calves and adult cattle were more likely to be shedding Cryptosporidium bovis and Cryptosporidium andersoni, respectively. The C. parvum subtypes detected were predominantly from types commonly identified in UK cattle (67% were either IIaA15G2R1 or IIaA17G1R1). A novel subtype, IIaA17G1R2, was identified from one cattle sample. The prevalence in co-grazed sheep was low (4%). Birds and rodents may represent significant reservoirs of Cryptosporidium due to high prevalence, large oocyst concentrations, and the detection of a C. parvum subtype known to be present in human populations, identified in samples from these wildlife. Cryptosporidium were detected in dirty water and manure, and also from pasture samples where slurry had been spread. On 64% of the farms, identical Cryptosporidium species were detected (mainly C. parvum or C. bovis) from different cattle groups on the farms, although no direct or indirect contact between the groups were recorded, apart from sharing staff. The same Cryptosporidium species were found in cattle, farm wastes and bird samples on the same farms, but rarely, or not at all, present in sheep or rodent samples. The matching of species/subtypes was also related to the proximity of the different sample sources which may indicate a potential transmission route.
从英格兰和威尔士的80个奶牛场收集了平均70份样本,样本来自牛、共同放牧的绵羊、野生动物和农场废弃物,以调查隐孢子虫的流行情况、潜在来源和传播途径。通过间接荧光抗体试验显微镜检查,在74个农场(92.5%)检测到至少一份阳性样本。牛的感染率为10.2%(95%置信区间9.4 - 11.1%),犊牛样本中的感染率更高,尤其是1月龄以下的犊牛(45.1%)。幼小犊牛也更有可能排出微小隐孢子虫和更高浓度的卵囊,而较大的犊牛和成年牛分别更有可能排出牛隐孢子虫和安氏隐孢子虫。检测到的微小隐孢子虫亚型主要来自英国牛中常见的类型(67%为IIaA15G2R1或IIaA17G1R1)。从一份牛样本中鉴定出一种新的亚型IIaA17G1R2。共同放牧的绵羊感染率较低(4%)。鸟类和啮齿动物可能是隐孢子虫的重要储存宿主,因为在这些野生动物的样本中感染率高、卵囊浓度大,并且检测到一种已知存在于人类群体中的微小隐孢子虫亚型。在脏水和粪便中检测到了隐孢子虫,在施用了粪肥的牧场样本中也检测到了隐孢子虫。在64%的农场中,从农场不同牛群中检测到相同的隐孢子虫种类(主要是微小隐孢子虫或牛隐孢子虫),尽管除了共用工作人员外,这些牛群之间没有记录到直接或间接接触。在同一农场的牛、农场废弃物和鸟类样本中发现了相同的隐孢子虫种类,但在绵羊或啮齿动物样本中很少或根本没有发现。物种/亚型的匹配也与不同样本来源的接近程度有关,这可能表明存在潜在的传播途径。