Corbett Faye, Jefferies Elizabeth, Burns Alistair, Lambon Ralph Matthew A
Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit (NARU), School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.
Department of Psychology, University of York, UK.
J Neuropsychol. 2015 Sep;9(2):219-41. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12047. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
Executive control is impaired from the early stages of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and this produces deregulated semantic cognition (Corbett, Jefferies, Burns, & Lambon Ralph, ; Perry, Watson, & Hodges, ). While control deficits should affect semantic retrieval across all modalities, previous studies have typically focused on verbal semantic tasks. Even when non-verbal semantic tasks have been used, these have typically employed simple picture-matching tasks, which may be influenced by abnormalities in covert naming. Therefore, in the present study, we examined 10 patients with AD on a battery of object-use tasks, in order to advance our understanding of the origins of non-verbal semantic deficits in this population. The AD patients' deficits were contrasted with previously published performance on the same tasks within two additional groups of patients, displaying either semantic degradation (semantic dementia) or deregulation of semantic retrieval (semantic aphasia; Corbett, Jefferies, Ehsan, & Lambon Ralph, ). While overall accuracy was comparable to the scores in both other groups, the AD patients' object-use impairment most closely resembled that observed in SA; they exhibited poorer performance on comprehension tasks that placed strong demands on executive control. A similar pattern was observed in the expressive domain: the AD and SA groups were relatively good at straightforward object use compared to executively demanding, mechanical puzzles. Error types also differed: while all patients omitted essential actions, the SA and AD groups' demonstrations also featured unrelated intrusions. An association between AD patients' object use and their scores on standard executive measures suggested that control deficits contributed to their non-verbal semantic deficits. Moreover, in a task specifically designed to manipulate executive demand, patients with AD (and SA) exhibited difficulty in thinking flexibly about the non-canonical uses of everyday objects, especially when distracted by semantically related objects. This study provides converging evidence for the notion that a failure of regulatory control contributes to multimodal semantic impairment in AD and uniquely demonstrates this pattern for the highly non-verbal domain of object use.
从阿尔茨海默病(AD)的早期阶段开始,执行控制就会受损,这会导致语义认知失调(科比特、杰弗里斯、伯恩斯和兰伯恩·拉尔夫;佩里、沃森和霍奇斯)。虽然控制缺陷应该会影响所有模态的语义检索,但以往的研究通常集中在言语语义任务上。即使使用了非言语语义任务,这些任务通常也采用简单的图片匹配任务,而这可能会受到隐性命名异常的影响。因此,在本研究中,我们对10名AD患者进行了一系列物体使用任务测试,以加深我们对该人群非言语语义缺陷根源的理解。将AD患者的缺陷与另外两组患者在相同任务上先前发表的表现进行对比,这两组患者分别表现出语义退化(语义性痴呆)或语义检索失调(语义性失语;科比特、杰弗里斯、埃桑和兰伯恩·拉尔夫)。虽然总体准确率与其他两组的分数相当,但AD患者的物体使用障碍与在语义性失语中观察到的最为相似;他们在对执行控制要求很高的理解任务上表现较差。在表达领域也观察到了类似的模式:与要求执行能力的机械拼图相比,AD组和语义性失语组在直接使用物体方面相对较好。错误类型也有所不同:虽然所有患者都遗漏了基本动作,但语义性失语组和AD组的演示中还出现了无关的插入动作。AD患者的物体使用与其在标准执行测量上的分数之间的关联表明,控制缺陷导致了他们的非言语语义缺陷。此外,在一项专门设计用于操纵执行要求的任务中,AD患者(和语义性失语患者)在灵活思考日常物体的非规范用途时表现出困难,尤其是在被语义相关物体分散注意力时。这项研究为调节控制失败导致AD中的多模态语义损伤这一观点提供了趋同证据,并独特地证明了在物体使用这一高度非言语领域中的这种模式。