Zdetsis Aristides D, Sigalas Michael M, Koukaras Emmanuel N
Molecular Engineering Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Patras, Patras 26500 GR, Greece.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014 Jul 21;16(27):14172-82. doi: 10.1039/c4cp01587h. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
With the initial motivation of optimizing hydrogen storage in beryllium nanocrystals, we have thoroughly and systematically studied the structural, cohesive, and electronic properties of Ben and BenHxn (n = 2-160, x = 0.1-2.4) nanoparticles as a function of both size (n) and hydrogen content (x), using density functional theory with a properly selected meta-hybrid functional and high level coupled cluster CCSD(T) theory for comparison. We have calculated the binding energies of Ben, BenHxn and [BeH2]n nanoparticles for a large range of n values. In the limit n→∞, we have obtained the experimental binding energy of a Be crystal (3.32 eV) with unexpectedly very good agreement (3.26 ± 0.06 eV), and a predicted value of 7.85 eV ± 0.02 eV for the binding energy of the [BeH2]∞ infinite system. We also predict that the majority of the lowest energy stoichiometric BenH2n nanoparticles are chains or chain-like structures. The tendency towards chain stabilization of BenHxn nanoparticles increases, as x approaches the stoichiometric value x = 2, leading for large values of n, as n→∞, to polymeric forms of bulk BeH2, which in the past have been considered as the leading forms of solid BeH2. For such 1-dimensional forms of [BeH2]n we have obtained and verified that the binding energy varies exactly proportionally to n(-1). The extrapolated desorption energy for such polymeric forms of solid BeH2 is found to be 19 ± 3 kJ mol(-1) in juxtaposition to the experimental value of 19 kJ mol(-1) for solid BeH2, suggesting that the difference ΔE in cohesive energy between the orthorhombic and polymeric form is very small (ΔE≈ 3 kJ mol(-1)). This is in full accord with the early discrepancies in the literature in determining and distinguishing the real crystal structure of solid BeH2.
出于优化铍纳米晶体中储氢性能的最初动机,我们使用密度泛函理论并结合适当选择的杂化泛函以及高水平耦合簇CCSD(T)理论进行比较,全面且系统地研究了Ben和BenHxn(n = 2 - 160,x = 0.1 - 2.4)纳米颗粒的结构、内聚能和电子性质,这些性质是尺寸(n)和氢含量(x)的函数。我们计算了大量n值下Ben、BenHxn和[BeH2]n纳米颗粒的结合能。在n→∞的极限情况下,我们得到了铍晶体的实验结合能(3.32 eV),出人意料地与计算值(3.26 ± 0.06 eV)非常吻合,同时还得到了[BeH2]∞无限体系结合能的预测值为7.85 eV ± 0.02 eV。我们还预测,大多数能量最低的化学计量比BenH2n纳米颗粒是链状或链状结构。随着x接近化学计量值x = 2,BenHxn纳米颗粒的链稳定趋势增强,对于大的n值,当n→∞时,会形成块状BeH2的聚合物形式,过去一直认为这是固体BeH2的主要形式。对于[BeH2]n的这种一维形式,我们已经得到并验证了结合能与n(-1)成正比。发现这种固体BeH2聚合物形式的外推解吸能为19 ± 3 kJ mol(-1),与固体BeH2的实验值19 kJ mol(-1)并列,这表明正交晶型和聚合物形式之间的内聚能差异ΔE非常小(ΔE≈ 3 kJ mol(-1))。这与文献中早期在确定和区分固体BeH2真实晶体结构方面的差异完全一致。