Vuori H
WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Qual Assur Health Care. 1989;1(2-3):147-59. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/1.2-3.147.
Originally written as a background paper for the discussion on the research needs in quality assurance by the WHO's global Advisory Committee on Health Research, this paper has two sections. The main section introduces key political, organizational and methodological issues. Special attention is being paid to unsolved problems and controversies to whose resolution research could contribute. The main issues and research needs relate to the concept of quality; conflicting expectations and objectives of the concerned parties; the need to broaden the scope of quality assurance from the science of medicine to art of medicine, from the process of care to the outcome of care, and from exclusively professional concerns to patient satisfaction; relationship between quality assurance and such related concepts as technology assessment and risk management; development of measurement methods; choice of proper subject of quality assurance; and setting criteria and standards of good quality. In addition, research into the epidemiology of quality, introduction and organization of quality assurance and correction of observed defects is needed. Quality assurance itself also needs to be evaluated.
本文最初是作为世界卫生组织全球卫生研究咨询委员会关于质量保证研究需求讨论的背景文件撰写的,分为两个部分。主要部分介绍了关键的政治、组织和方法学问题。特别关注尚未解决的问题和争议,研究可为解决这些问题做出贡献。主要问题和研究需求涉及质量概念;相关方相互冲突的期望和目标;将质量保证的范围从医学科学拓宽到医学艺术、从护理过程拓宽到护理结果、从仅关注专业问题拓宽到患者满意度的必要性;质量保证与技术评估和风险管理等相关概念之间的关系;测量方法的开发;质量保证适当主体的选择;以及制定优质的标准和规范。此外,还需要对质量流行病学、质量保证的引入和组织以及对观察到的缺陷进行纠正进行研究。质量保证本身也需要进行评估。