• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种通过2,2`-联氮-双-(3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸)自由基阳离子测量酚类和非酚类基团活性差异的方法。

A method for measuring difference in activity of phenolic and non- phenolic groups through 2,2` azino-bis-(3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6- sulphonate) radical cation.

作者信息

Masood Nusrat, Luqman Suaib

机构信息

Molecular Bioprospection Department, Biotechnology Division, CSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal & Aromatic Plants, Lucknow-226015, India.

出版信息

Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2014;17(8):718-22. doi: 10.2174/1386207317666140605110401.

DOI:10.2174/1386207317666140605110401
PMID:24910258
Abstract

A 2, 2`azino-bis-(3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulphonate) radical cation-based method was optimized in 96 well plates to evaluate the comparative scavenging potential of phenolic and non-phenolic group of molecules with respect to control. The interactions of these molecules with ABTS radical cation were quantified on the basis of their relative influence on the bleaching of a bluish-green color complex in a structure- and dose-dependent manner. Experimentally, the developed assay provided evidence that phenolic molecules are more reactive with ABTS radical than non-phenolic compounds because of their resonance and hyper-conjugation effects.

摘要

在96孔板中优化了基于2,2'-偶氮双-(3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸盐)自由基阳离子的方法,以评估酚类和非酚类分子相对于对照的比较清除潜力。这些分子与ABTS自由基阳离子的相互作用根据它们对蓝绿色络合物漂白的相对影响以结构和剂量依赖的方式进行定量。实验表明,由于酚类分子的共振和超共轭效应,它们与ABTS自由基的反应性比非酚类化合物更高。

相似文献

1
A method for measuring difference in activity of phenolic and non- phenolic groups through 2,2` azino-bis-(3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6- sulphonate) radical cation.一种通过2,2`-联氮-双-(3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸)自由基阳离子测量酚类和非酚类基团活性差异的方法。
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2014;17(8):718-22. doi: 10.2174/1386207317666140605110401.
2
ABTS/PP Decolorization Assay of Antioxidant Capacity Reaction Pathways.ABTS/PP 清除法测定抗氧化能力的反应途径。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 8;21(3):1131. doi: 10.3390/ijms21031131.
3
Comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography coupled to the ABTS radical scavenging assay: a powerful method for the analysis of phenolic antioxidants.二维全液相色谱联用ABTS自由基清除率测定法:一种分析酚类抗氧化剂的强大方法。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014 Jul;406(17):4233-42. doi: 10.1007/s00216-014-7847-z. Epub 2014 May 11.
4
Comparative reaction rates of various antioxidants with ABTS radical cation.各种抗氧化剂与ABTS自由基阳离子的反应速率比较
J Agric Food Chem. 2009 Feb 25;57(4):1156-61. doi: 10.1021/jf8026765.
5
Isolation and Characterization of the 2,2'-Azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) Radical Cation-Scavenging Reaction Products of Arbutin.熊果苷的 2,2'-偶氮双(3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸)(ABTS)自由基阳离子清除反应产物的分离与表征。
J Agric Food Chem. 2016 Sep 28;64(38):7285-90. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b02847. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
6
Phenolic and enolic hydroxyl groups in curcumin: which plays the major role in scavenging radicals?姜黄素中的酚羟基和烯醇羟基:哪一个在清除自由基中起主要作用?
J Agric Food Chem. 2009 Nov 25;57(22):11041-6. doi: 10.1021/jf902244g.
7
Endogenous and dietary indoles: a class of antioxidants and radical scavengers in the ABTS assay.内源性和膳食吲哚:ABTS 测定中的一类抗氧化剂和自由基清除剂。
Free Radic Res. 2004 Mar;38(3):323-31. doi: 10.1080/10611860310001648167.
8
Radical scavenging potential of phenolics from Bryophyllum pinnatum (LAM.) OKEN.厚叶落地生根中酚类物质的自由基清除能力。
Prep Biochem Biotechnol. 2011;41(3):305-19. doi: 10.1080/10826068.2010.541314.
9
In vitro antioxidant activity and phenolic content of Cedrus brevifolia bark.短叶雪松树皮的体外抗氧化活性和酚类含量
Nat Prod Commun. 2014 Apr;9(4):481-2.
10
Optimization of ABTS radical cation assay specifically for determination of antioxidant capacity of intracellular extracts of microalgae and cyanobacteria.ABTS 自由基阳离子测定法的优化,专门用于测定微藻和蓝藻细胞内提取物的抗氧化能力。
Food Chem. 2013 May 1;138(1):638-43. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.09.106. Epub 2012 Nov 8.