Butwick A, Hass C, Wong J, Lyell D, El-Sayed Y
Department of Anesthesiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014 Aug;23(3):238-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
The peripartum management of anticoagulated patients poses important challenges for obstetric anesthesiologists, especially when deciding to perform neuraxial block. However, there is limited evidence evaluating anticoagulant prescribing practices and neuraxial block utilization in this setting. Our objective was to examine peripartum anticoagulant prescribing and anesthetic practices in a cohort of anticoagulated patients receiving subcutaneous enoxaparin, and subcutaneous or intravenous unfractionated heparin.
We performed a retrospective study of anticoagulant prescribing patterns and anesthetic interventions among patients receiving enoxaparin and/or unfractionated heparin who delivered at a USA obstetric center over a seven-year period.
We identified 101 patients who received enoxaparin and/or unfractionated heparin before delivery. Thirty-nine (38.6%) patients received enoxaparin only, 41 (40.6%) patients received enoxaparin bridged to subcutaneous unfractionated heparin, 11 (10.9%) patients received enoxaparin and were converted to intravenous unfractionated heparin and 10 (9.9%) patients received only subcutaneous unfractionated heparin. The overall rate of neuraxial block utilization was 80.2%. The median [IQR] time-period between the last dose of enoxaparin and neuraxial block was significantly shorter for patients who received only enoxaparin vs. enoxaparin with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (54h [12-192h] (n=26) vs. 216h [39-504h] (n=23), P=0.04). Among patients who received only subcutaneous unfractionated heparin, the time period between unfractionated heparin and neuraxial block was 24h [19-51h].
In this study, the neuraxial block rate was high among patients receiving enoxaparin and/or subcutaneous unfractionated heparin with patients undergoing relatively long periods off anticoagulation. Careful multidisciplinary planning is recommended for the peripartum management of anticoagulated pregnant patients.
抗凝患者的围产期管理给产科麻醉医生带来了重大挑战,尤其是在决定实施神经轴阻滞时。然而,在这种情况下,评估抗凝药物处方实践和神经轴阻滞使用情况的证据有限。我们的目的是研究一组接受皮下依诺肝素、皮下或静脉注射普通肝素的抗凝患者的围产期抗凝药物处方和麻醉实践。
我们对在一家美国产科中心分娩的接受依诺肝素和/或普通肝素治疗的患者的抗凝药物处方模式和麻醉干预进行了回顾性研究,研究时间跨度为七年。
我们确定了101例在分娩前接受依诺肝素和/或普通肝素治疗的患者。39例(38.6%)患者仅接受依诺肝素治疗,41例(40.6%)患者接受依诺肝素与皮下普通肝素桥接治疗;11例(10.9%)患者接受依诺肝素治疗后转为静脉注射普通肝素,10例(9.9%)患者仅接受皮下普通肝素治疗。神经轴阻滞的总体使用率为80.2%。仅接受依诺肝素治疗的患者与接受依诺肝素与皮下普通肝素联合治疗的患者相比,最后一剂依诺肝素与神经轴阻滞之间的中位[四分位间距]时间显著缩短(54小时[12 - 192小时](n = 26)对216小时[39 - 504小时](n = 23),P = 0.04)。在仅接受皮下普通肝素治疗的患者中,普通肝素与神经轴阻滞之间的时间为24小时[19 -