Morters M K, Bharadwaj S, Whay H R, Cleaveland S, Damriyasa I Md, Wood J L N
Disease Dynamics Unit, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Praxis-Institute for Participatory Practices, New Delhi, India.
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Sep 1;116(1-2):203-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 May 9.
The existence of unowned, free-roaming dogs capable of maintaining adequate body condition without direct human oversight has serious implications for disease control and animal welfare, including reducing effective vaccination coverage against rabies through limiting access for vaccination, and absolving humans from the responsibility of providing adequate care for a domesticated species. Mark-recapture methods previously used to estimate the fraction of unowned dogs in free-roaming populations have limitations, particularly when most of the dogs are owned. We used participatory methods, described as Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA), as a novel alternative to mark-recapture methods in two villages in Bali, Indonesia. PRA was implemented at the banjar (or sub-village)-level to obtain consensus on the food sources of the free-roaming dogs. Specific methods included semi-structured discussion, visualisation tools and ranking. The PRA results agreed with the preceding household surveys and direct observations, designed to evaluate the same variables, and confirmed that a population of unowned, free-roaming dogs in sufficiently good condition to be sustained independently of direct human support was unlikely to exist.
能够在没有人类直接监管的情况下维持良好身体状况的无主流浪狗的存在,对疾病控制和动物福利有着严重影响,包括通过限制疫苗接种机会降低狂犬病有效疫苗接种覆盖率,以及使人类免除为家养物种提供充分照料的责任。以前用于估计流浪狗群体中无主狗比例的标记重捕方法存在局限性,尤其是当大多数狗都有主人时。我们在印度尼西亚巴厘岛的两个村庄采用了参与式方法,即参与式农村评估(PRA),作为标记重捕方法的一种新颖替代方法。PRA在村(或次村)一级实施,以就流浪狗的食物来源达成共识。具体方法包括半结构化讨论、可视化工具和排序。PRA结果与之前旨在评估相同变量的家庭调查和直接观察结果一致,并证实不太可能存在一群身体状况良好、能够在没有人类直接支持的情况下独立生存的无主流浪狗。