Carrié Cédric, Biais Matthieu, Lafitte Stéphane, Grenier Nicolas, Revel Philippe, Janvier Gérard
aEmergency Department bImaging Department CHU Pellegrin cUniversité Bordeaux Ségalen, Bordeaux dLaboratory of echocardiography, CHU Haut-Lévêque, Pessac, France.
Eur J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;22(6):419-25. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000172.
This observational study aimed to define the learning curve in goal-directed ultrasound (US) after a 2-day training course dedicated to novice emergency residents.
After completion of the training program, 180 patients requiring goal-directed US examination were examined by a resident and by an experienced investigator. The main endpoints were the diagnostic agreement between the two operators for 14 clinical questions, the duration of the examinations, the number of nonaddressed questions, and the final diagnosis. All criteria were analyzed according to the experience of the resident every 10 examinations.
After 30 supervised examinations, residents adequately assessed with a very good or considerable agreement global left ventricular systolic dysfunction [κ=0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-1], severe right ventricular dilation (κ=0.73; 95% CI: 0.37-1), inferior vena cava diameter (κ=0.88; 95% CI: 0.71-1), and pericardial effusion (κ=0.85; 95% CI: 0.55-1). In general US, 20 supervised examinations were required to diagnose intraperitoneal effusion (κ=0.81; 95% CI: 0.61-1), cholelithiasis (κ=0.73; 95% CI: 0.36-1), obstructive uropathy (κ=0.85; 95% CI: 0.56-1), bladder distention (κ=1; 95% CI: 1-1), abdominal aortic aneurism (κ=0.9; 95% CI: 0.74-1), alveolar interstitial pattern (κ=0.87; 95% CI: 0.74-0.99), consolidated lung (κ=0.83; 95% CI: 0.68-0.97), or pleural effusion (κ=0.89; 95% CI: 0.77-1). After 30 supervised examinations, the overall diagnostic accuracy was judged excellent between the two investigators, with a significant improvement during the learning curve.
The performance of 30 supervised and goal-oriented examinations appeared adapted to adequately answer clinical questions covered by core applications of emergency US.
本观察性研究旨在确定在为急诊住院医师举办的为期2天的培训课程后,目标导向超声(US)的学习曲线。
培训项目结束后,由一名住院医师和一名经验丰富的研究人员对180例需要进行目标导向超声检查的患者进行检查。主要终点指标为两名操作者对14个临床问题的诊断一致性、检查持续时间、未解决问题的数量以及最终诊断结果。根据住院医师每10次检查的经验对所有标准进行分析。
经过30次带教检查后,住院医师能够对以下情况进行充分评估,且一致性非常好或相当高:整体左心室收缩功能障碍[κ=0.92;95%置信区间(CI):0.80-1]、严重右心室扩张(κ=0.73;95%CI:0.37-1)、下腔静脉直径(κ=0.88;95%CI:0.71-1)以及心包积液(κ=0.85;95%CI:0.55-1)。在一般超声检查中,诊断腹腔积液(κ=0.81;95%CI:0.61-1)、胆结石(κ=0.73;95%CI:0.36-1)、梗阻性尿路病(κ=0.85;95%CI:0.56-1)、膀胱扩张(κ=1;95%CI:1-1)、腹主动脉瘤(κ=0.9;95%CI:0.74-1)、肺泡间质模式(κ=0.87;95%CI:0.74-0.99)、肺实变(κ=0.83;95%CI:0.68-0.97)或胸腔积液(κ=0.89;95%CI:0.77-1)需要20次带教检查。经过30次带教检查后,两名研究人员之间的总体诊断准确性被判定为优秀,在学习曲线期间有显著提高。
30次带教和目标导向检查的表现似乎足以充分回答急诊超声核心应用所涵盖的临床问题。