Suppr超能文献

穿透性创伤后腹主动脉和髂动脉压迫:可行性研究。

Abdominal aortic and iliac artery compression following penetrating trauma: a study of feasibility.

机构信息

1Collaborative Program in Resuscitation Science, Faculty of Medicine,University of Toronto,Toronto,Ontario,Canada.

2Division of Critical Care Medicine,University of Alberta,Edmonton,Alberta,Canada.

出版信息

Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014 Jun;29(3):299-302. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1400051X. Epub 2014 Jun 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Penetrating junctional trauma is a leading cause of preventable death on the battlefield. Similarly challenging in civilian settings, exsanguination from the vessels of the abdomen, pelvis, and groin can occur in moments. Therefore, iliac artery or abdominal aortic compression has been recommended. Based on prior research, 120 lbs (54 kg) or 140 lbs (63 kg) of compression may be required to occlude these vessels, respectively. Whether most rescuers can generate this amount of compression is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine how many people in a convenience sample of 44 health care professionals can compress 120 lbs and 140 lbs.

METHODS

This study simulated aortic and iliac artery compression. Consent was obtained from 44 clinicians (27 female; 17 male) from two large urban hospitals in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Participants compressed the abdominal model, which consisted of a medical scale and a 250 ml bag of saline, covered by a folded hospital blanket and placed on the ground. In random order, participants compressed a force they believed maintainable for 20 minutes ("maintainable effort") and then a maximum force they could maintain for two minutes ("maximum effort"). Compression was also performed with a knee. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the data.

RESULTS

Compression was directly proportional to the clinician's body weight. Participants compressed a mean of 55% of their body weight with two hands at a maintainable effort, and 69% at a maximum effort. At maintainable manual effort, participants compressed a mean of 86 lbs (39 kg). Sixteen percent could compress over 120 lbs, but none over 140 lbs. At maximum effort, participants compressed a mean of 108 lbs (48 kg). Thirty-four percent could compress greater than 120 lbs and 11% could compress greater than 140 lbs. Using a single knee, participants compressed a mean weight of 80% of their body weight with no difference between maintainable and maximum effort.

CONCLUSION

This work suggests that bimanual compression following penetrating junctional trauma is feasible. However, it is difficult, and is not likely achievable or sustainable by a majority of rescuers. Manual compression (used to temporize until device application and operative rescue) requires a large body mass. To maintain 140 lbs of compression (for example during a lengthy transport), participants needed to weigh 255 lbs (115 kg). Alternatively, they needed to weigh 203 lbs (92 kg) to be successful during brief periods. Knee compression may be preferable, especially for lower-weight rescuers.

摘要

简介

穿透性联合伤是战场上可预防死亡的主要原因。在民用环境中同样具有挑战性,腹部、骨盆和腹股沟的血管会迅速出血。因此,建议对髂动脉或腹主动脉进行压迫。基于先前的研究,分别需要 120 磅(54 千克)或 140 磅(63 千克)的压力才能阻断这些血管。尚不清楚大多数救援人员是否能产生这种程度的压力。

目的

确定便利样本中的 44 名医疗保健专业人员中有多少人可以按压 120 磅和 140 磅。

方法

本研究模拟了主动脉和髂动脉压迫。从加拿大阿尔伯塔省埃德蒙顿的两家大型城市医院获得了 44 名临床医生(27 名女性;17 名男性)的同意。参与者按压腹部模型,该模型由一个医疗秤和一个 250 毫升的生理盐水袋组成,由折叠的医院毯子覆盖,并放在地上。参与者以他们认为可以维持 20 分钟的力(“可维持的力”)进行随机顺序按压,然后以可维持两分钟的最大力(“最大力”)进行按压。还使用膝盖进行了按压。使用描述性统计数据评估数据。

结果

按压与临床医生的体重成正比。参与者以可维持的力用双手按压其体重的 55%,最大力按压其体重的 69%。在可维持的手动努力下,参与者平均按压 86 磅(39 千克)。16%的人可以按压超过 120 磅,但没有人可以按压超过 140 磅。在最大努力下,参与者平均按压 108 磅(48 千克)。34%的人可以按压超过 120 磅,11%的人可以按压超过 140 磅。使用单个膝盖,参与者以可维持和最大力按压其体重的 80%,两者之间没有差异。

结论

这项工作表明,穿透性联合伤后进行双手按压是可行的。然而,这很难,并且不太可能由大多数救援人员实现或维持。手动按压(用于临时维持,直到应用设备和手术救援)需要较大的体重。要维持 140 磅的压力(例如在长时间运输期间),参与者需要体重为 255 磅(115 千克)。或者,他们需要在短暂的时间内成功达到 203 磅(92 千克)。膝盖按压可能更可取,尤其是对于体重较轻的救援人员。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验