Phillips Kristy, Wright Bradley J, Kent Stephen
School of Psychological Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
School of Psychological Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
J Psychosom Res. 2014 Jul;77(1):13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 5.
To determine if cognitive processing, and subjective and physiological responses to stress and relaxation differed between an irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) group and control group. How these variables relate to the severity of IBS symptoms was also determined.
Twenty-one IBS participants and 20 controls provided cognitive (attention and processing), subjective (perceived stress and vigour), and physiological (heart rate, blood pressure, and skin conductance) data during a relaxation and stress phase. Logistic regression analyses determined which variables are related to the IBS group and hierarchical linear regression assessed how the variables are related to the severity of IBS symptoms.
Subjective and cognitive factors (drowsiness at baseline, total vigour, and reduced Stroop colour-naming accuracy for negative words) are significantly related to IBS, χ2 (3, N=41)=23.67, p<.001, accurately categorising 85% of participants. IBS symptom severity was associated with both subjective (drowsiness at baseline and a smaller reduction in tiredness from relaxation to stress) and physiological (smaller increase in systolic blood pressure from baseline to stress phase and lower skin conductance at baseline) variables. This model predicted IBS severity, F (4, 16)=11.20, p<.001, and accounted for 74% of the variability in scores.
A negative attention bias, which may be related to a negative self-schema, as well as perceived low vigour were important in categorising IBS. Low subjective vigour and reduced physiological reactivity to both relaxation and stress conditions were associated with IBS severity, suggestive of illness-related allostatic load.
确定肠易激综合征(IBS)组与对照组在认知加工以及对压力和放松的主观及生理反应方面是否存在差异。还确定了这些变量与IBS症状严重程度之间的关系。
21名IBS参与者和20名对照组人员在放松和压力阶段提供了认知(注意力和加工)、主观(感知压力和活力)和生理(心率、血压和皮肤电传导)数据。逻辑回归分析确定哪些变量与IBS组相关,分层线性回归评估这些变量与IBS症状严重程度的关系。
主观和认知因素(基线时的嗜睡、总活力以及对消极词汇的Stroop颜色命名准确性降低)与IBS显著相关,χ2(3,N = 41)= 23.67,p <.001,准确分类了85%的参与者。IBS症状严重程度与主观(基线时的嗜睡以及从放松到压力状态时疲劳感减轻幅度较小)和生理(从基线到压力阶段收缩压升高幅度较小以及基线时皮肤电传导较低)变量均相关。该模型预测了IBS严重程度,F(4,16)= 11.20,p <.001,解释了分数变异的74%。
可能与消极自我图式相关的消极注意偏向以及感知到的低活力在IBS分类中很重要。低主观活力以及对放松和压力条件的生理反应性降低与IBS严重程度相关,提示与疾病相关的非稳态负荷。