• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在工作区中,利用有限的安全有利位置进行数据采集时,驾驶模拟器对驾驶员行为的验证。

Driving simulator validation of driver behavior with limited safe vantage points for data collection in work zones.

机构信息

Civil Engineering Department, University of Alaska, Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, USA.

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Missouri University of Science Technology, Rolla, MO, USA.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2014 Jun;49:53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.02.012. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2014.02.012
PMID:24913487
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study is aimed at validating a driving simulator (DS) for the study of driver behavior in work zones. A validation study requires field data collection. For studies conducted in highway work zones, the availability of safe vantage points for data collection at critical locations can be a significant challenge. A validation framework is therefore proposed in this paper, demonstrated using a fixed-based DS that addresses the issue by using a global positioning system (GPS).

METHODS

The validation of the DS was conducted using objective and subjective evaluations. The objective validation was divided into qualitative and quantitative evaluations. The DS was validated by comparing the results of simulation with the field data, which were collected using a GPS along the highway and video recordings at specific locations in a work zone. The constructed work zone scenario in the DS was subjectively evaluated with 46 participants.

RESULTS

The objective evaluation established the absolute and relative validity of the DS. The mean speeds from the DS data showed excellent agreement with the field data. The subjective evaluation indicated realistic driving experience by the participants.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

The use of GPS showed that continuous data collected along the highway can overcome the challenges of unavailability of safe vantage points especially at critical locations. Further, a validated DS can be used for examining driver behavior in complex situations by replicating realistic scenarios.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在验证用于研究工作区驾驶员行为的驾驶模拟器(DS)。验证研究需要进行现场数据收集。对于在高速公路工作区进行的研究,在关键位置获得安全的有利位置进行数据收集可能是一个重大挑战。因此,本文提出了一个验证框架,该框架使用全球定位系统(GPS)来解决这个问题,使用基于固定的 DS 进行演示。

方法

使用客观和主观评估对 DS 进行验证。客观验证分为定性和定量评估。通过将模拟结果与沿公路使用 GPS 收集的现场数据以及特定工作区位置的视频记录进行比较,对 DS 进行验证。46 名参与者对 DS 中的构建工作区场景进行了主观评估。

结果

客观评估确定了 DS 的绝对和相对有效性。DS 数据中的平均速度与现场数据非常吻合。主观评估表明参与者具有逼真的驾驶体验。

实际应用

GPS 的使用表明,沿公路连续收集的数据可以克服特别是在关键位置无法获得安全有利位置的挑战。此外,通过复制逼真的场景,经过验证的 DS 可以用于研究复杂情况下的驾驶员行为。

相似文献

1
Driving simulator validation of driver behavior with limited safe vantage points for data collection in work zones.在工作区中,利用有限的安全有利位置进行数据采集时,驾驶模拟器对驾驶员行为的验证。
J Safety Res. 2014 Jun;49:53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.02.012. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
2
Traffic calming along rural highways crossing small urban communities: driving simulator experiment.农村公路穿越小型城市社区的交通平静化:驾驶模拟器实验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1585-94. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.017. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
3
Work zone sign design for increased driver compliance and worker safety.为提高驾驶员的遵守情况和工人安全而设计的工作区标志。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Sep;106:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
4
Behavioural accident avoidance science: understanding response in collision incipient conditions.行为事故避免科学:理解碰撞初始条件下的反应
Ergonomics. 2003 Oct 10;46(12):1111-35. doi: 10.1080/0014013031000136386.
5
Creating pedestrian crash scenarios in a driving simulator environment.在驾驶模拟器环境中创建行人碰撞场景。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 1:S12-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1015001.
6
Pilot evaluation of the short-term effect of driving simulation on novice adolescent drivers.驾驶模拟对新手青少年驾驶员短期效果的初步评估。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):83-6; discussion 87. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182988a51.
7
Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures.使用替代安全措施验证驾驶模拟器。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jan;40(1):274-88. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.06.007. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
8
Determining the drivers' acceptance of EFTCD in highway work zones.确定驾驶员对高速公路工作区 EFTCD 的接受程度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 May;43(3):762-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.023. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
9
Effectiveness evaluation of simulative workshops for newly licensed drivers.新领证驾驶员模拟驾驶培训效果评估
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Feb;63:30-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.018. Epub 2013 Oct 19.
10
When does alcohol hurt? A driving simulator study.酒精何时会造成伤害?一项驾驶模拟器研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Dec;109:89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A Simulation-Based Study of the Effect of Brake Light Flashing Frequency on Driver Brake Behavior from the Perspective of Response Time.基于响应时间视角的刹车灯闪烁频率对驾驶员制动行为影响的模拟研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Sep 14;12(9):332. doi: 10.3390/bs12090332.
2
Car drivers coping with hazardous events in real versus simulated situations: Declarative, behavioral and physiological data used to assess drivers' feeling of presence.驾驶员在真实与模拟环境下应对危险事件的比较:用于评估驾驶员存在感的数据(描述性、行为和生理)。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0247373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247373. eCollection 2021.