• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行为事故避免科学:理解碰撞初始条件下的反应

Behavioural accident avoidance science: understanding response in collision incipient conditions.

作者信息

Hancock P A, de Ridder S N

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2003 Oct 10;46(12):1111-35. doi: 10.1080/0014013031000136386.

DOI:10.1080/0014013031000136386
PMID:12933076
Abstract

Road traffic accidents are the single greatest cause of fatality in the workplace and the primary cause of all accidental death in the US to the age of 78. However, behavioural analysis of response in the final seconds and milliseconds before collision has been a most difficult proposition since the quantitative recording of such events has largely been beyond cost feasibility for road transportation. Here, a new and innovative research strategy is reported that permits just such a form of investigation to be conducted in a safe and effective manner. Specifically, a linked simulation environment has been constructed in which drivers are physically located in two adjacent, full-vehicle simulators acting within a shared single virtual driving world. As reported here for the first time, this innovative technology creates situations that provide avoidance responses paralleling those observed in real-world conditions. Within this shared virtual world 46 participants (25 female, 21 male) were tested who met in two ambiguous traffic situations: an intersection and a hill scenario. At the intersection the two drivers approached each other at an angle of 135 degrees and buildings placed at the intersection blocked the view of both drivers from early detection of the opposing vehicle. The second condition represented a 'wrong' way conflict. Each driver proceeded along a three-lane highway from opposite directions. A hill impeded the oncoming view of each driver who only saw the conflicting vehicle briefly as it crested the brow of the hill. Driver avoidance responses of steering wheel, brake, and accelerator activation were recorded to the nearest millisecond. Qualitative results were obtained through a post-experience questionnaire in which participants were asked about their driving habits, simulator experience and their particular response to the experimental events which they had encountered. The results indicated that: (1) situations have been created which provided avoidance responses as they have been recorded in real-world circumstances, (2) the recorded avoidance responses depended directly upon viewing times, and (3) the very short viewing times in this experiment resulted in a single avoidance action, largely represented by a random choice of swerve to either right or left. The present results lead us to posit that in order to be able to design accident avoidance mechanism that respond appropriately in the diverse situations encountered, there is a need to pay particular attention to mutual viewing times for drivers. The general implications for a behavioural science of collision-avoidance are evaluated in light of the present findings.

摘要

道路交通事故是工作场所死亡的最大单一原因,也是美国78岁以下所有意外死亡的主要原因。然而,由于对这类事件进行定量记录在很大程度上超出了道路运输的成本可行性,因此对碰撞前最后几秒和几毫秒内的反应进行行为分析一直是一项极其困难的任务。在此,报告了一种新的创新研究策略,该策略允许以安全有效的方式进行这种形式的调查。具体而言,构建了一个联动模拟环境,其中驾驶员实际位于两个相邻的整车模拟器中,在一个共享的单一虚拟驾驶世界中运行。如本文首次报道的那样,这种创新技术创造了一些情境,这些情境提供的避险反应与在现实世界条件下观察到的反应相似。在这个共享虚拟世界中,对46名参与者(25名女性,21名男性)进行了测试,他们在两种模糊的交通情况下相遇:一个十字路口和一个山坡场景。在十字路口,两名驾驶员以135度角相向而行,十字路口处的建筑物挡住了双方驾驶员尽早发现对方车辆的视线。第二种情况代表一种“逆行”冲突。每位驾驶员从相反方向沿着一条三车道高速公路行驶。一座小山阻碍了每位驾驶员对迎面而来车辆的视线,他们只能在冲突车辆到达山顶时短暂地看到它。记录驾驶员方向盘、刹车和油门启动的避险反应,精确到毫秒。通过一份经验后调查问卷获得定性结果,在问卷中询问参与者他们的驾驶习惯、模拟器体验以及他们对所遇到的实验事件的具体反应。结果表明:(1)创造了一些情境,这些情境提供了与在现实世界中记录到的避险反应相同的反应;(2)记录到的避险反应直接取决于观察时间;(3)本实验中非常短的观察时间导致了单一的避险行动,主要表现为随机选择向右侧或左侧转弯。目前的结果使我们认为,为了能够设计出在遇到的各种情况下做出适当反应的事故避险机制,有必要特别关注驾驶员之间的相互观察时间。根据目前的研究结果,评估了对碰撞避免行为科学的一般影响。

相似文献

1
Behavioural accident avoidance science: understanding response in collision incipient conditions.行为事故避免科学:理解碰撞初始条件下的反应
Ergonomics. 2003 Oct 10;46(12):1111-35. doi: 10.1080/0014013031000136386.
2
Effects of experience and electronic stability control on low friction collision avoidance in a truck driving simulator.经验和电子稳定控制系统对卡车驾驶模拟器中低摩擦避撞的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:1266-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.035. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
3
Investigation into the effect of an intersection crash warning system on driving performance in a simulator.交叉口碰撞预警系统对模拟驾驶性能影响的研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2011 Oct;12(5):529-37. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.603169.
4
Determination of pre-impact occupant postures and analysis of consequences on injury outcome. Part I: a driving simulator study.碰撞前乘员姿势的确定及其对损伤结果的影响分析。第一部分:驾驶模拟器研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.07.012.
5
How do drivers avoid collisions? A driving simulator-based study.驾驶员如何避免碰撞?基于驾驶模拟器的研究。
J Safety Res. 2019 Sep;70:89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
6
Traffic calming along rural highways crossing small urban communities: driving simulator experiment.农村公路穿越小型城市社区的交通平静化:驾驶模拟器实验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1585-94. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.017. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
7
Associating crash avoidance maneuvers with driver attributes and accident characteristics: a mixed logit model approach.关联避撞操作与驾驶员属性和事故特征:混合逻辑回归模型方法。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(3):315-26. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.654015.
8
Enhancing hazard avoidance in teen-novice riders.提高青少年新手骑手的避险能力。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):247-52. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.017.
9
Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures.使用替代安全措施验证驾驶模拟器。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jan;40(1):274-88. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.06.007. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
10
Young drivers' optimism bias for accident risk and driving skill: Accountability and insight experience manipulations.年轻驾驶员对事故风险和驾驶技能的乐观偏差:责任和洞察力经验的操纵。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jul;43(4):1309-15. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.01.013. Epub 2011 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Trolleys, crashes, and perception-a survey on how current autonomous vehicles debates invoke problematic expectations.手推车、碰撞与认知——关于当前自动驾驶车辆争论如何引发问题预期的调查
AI Ethics. 2024;4(2):473-484. doi: 10.1007/s43681-023-00284-7. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
2
Driving with hemianopia VIII: Effects of a vibro-tactile assistance system on safety and gaze behavior in pedestrian crossing situations.偏盲患者驾车之八:振动触觉辅助系统对人行横道场景中安全性及注视行为的影响
Safety (Basel). 2021 Mar;7(1). doi: 10.3390/safety7010018. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
3
Effects of simulated mild vision loss on gaze, driving and interaction behaviors in pedestrian crossing situations.
模拟轻度视力损失对行人穿越情境中注视、驾驶和交互行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Apr;125:138-151. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.026. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
4
Red-Light-Running Crashes' Classification, Comparison, and Risk Analysis Based on General Estimates System (GES) Crash Database.基于通用估计系统(GES)事故数据库的闯红灯事故分类、比较和风险分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 19;15(6):1290. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061290.