Liu Ping, Mould Diane R
Clinical Pharmacology, Global Established Pharma Business, Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut, USA
Projections Research Inc., Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Aug;58(8):4727-36. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02809-13. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
To evaluate the exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety of voriconazole and anidulafungin in adult patients with invasive aspergillosis (IA), a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) analysis was performed with data from a phase 3, prospective, double-blind, comparative study evaluating voriconazole and anidulafungin combination therapy versus voriconazole (and placebo) monotherapy. Anidulafungin/placebo treatment duration was 2 to 4 weeks, and voriconazole treatment duration was 6 weeks. Efficacy (6-week all-causality mortality and 6-week global response [n = 176]) and safety (hepatic [n = 238], visual [n = 199], and psychiatric [n = 183] adverse events [AEs]) endpoints were analyzed separately using a binary logistic regression model. In IA patients receiving voriconazole monotherapy, no positive associations between voriconazole exposure and efficacy or safety were identified. In IA patients receiving combination therapy, no positive associations between voriconazole or anidulafungin exposures and efficacy were identified. The 6-week survival rate tended to increase as anidulafungin treatment duration increased; this finding should be considered with caution. Additionally, in IA patients receiving combination therapy, a positive association between voriconazole and anidulafungin exposures (area under the curve [AUC] and trough concentration [C(min)]) and hepatic AEs was established; a weak positive association between voriconazole exposure (AUC and C(min)) and psychiatric AEs was also established, but no association between voriconazole exposure and visual AEs was identified. Besides the drug exposures, no other covariates (i.e., CYP2C19 genotype status, age, weight, body mass index, sex, race, or neutropenia status) were identified as significant predictors of the efficacy and safety endpoints in IA patients. This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00531479).
为评估伏立康唑和阿尼芬净在成年侵袭性曲霉病(IA)患者中的疗效和安全性的暴露-反应关系,利用一项3期前瞻性双盲对照研究的数据进行了群体药代动力学-药效学(PK-PD)分析,该研究比较了伏立康唑和阿尼芬净联合治疗与伏立康唑(及安慰剂)单药治疗。阿尼芬净/安慰剂治疗疗程为2至4周,伏立康唑治疗疗程为6周。疗效(6周全因死亡率和6周总体反应[n = 176])和安全性(肝脏[n = 238]、视觉[n = 199]和精神[n = 183]不良事件[AEs])终点分别使用二元逻辑回归模型进行分析。在接受伏立康唑单药治疗的IA患者中,未发现伏立康唑暴露与疗效或安全性之间存在正相关。在接受联合治疗的IA患者中,未发现伏立康唑或阿尼芬净暴露与疗效之间存在正相关。随着阿尼芬净治疗疗程的增加,6周生存率有升高趋势;该发现应谨慎看待。此外,在接受联合治疗的IA患者中,伏立康唑和阿尼芬净暴露(曲线下面积[AUC]和谷浓度[C(min)])与肝脏不良事件之间存在正相关;伏立康唑暴露(AUC和C(min))与精神不良事件之间也存在弱正相关,但未发现伏立康唑暴露与视觉不良事件之间存在相关性。除药物暴露外,未发现其他协变量(即CYP2C19基因型状态、年龄、体重、体重指数、性别、种族或中性粒细胞减少状态)是IA患者疗效和安全性终点的显著预测因素。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT00531479)注册。