Suppr超能文献

联合抗真菌治疗在韩国血液系统侵袭性曲霉病患者中的疗效和安全性。

Efficacy and safety of combination antifungal therapy in Korean haematological patients with invasive aspergillosis.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

Pfizer Inc, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Mycoses. 2019 Oct;62(10):969-978. doi: 10.1111/myc.12972. Epub 2019 Aug 18.

Abstract

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed the efficacy, safety and tolerability of voriconazole+anidulafungin (combination) or voriconazole+placebo (monotherapy) for invasive aspergillosis (IA; NCT00531479). We present a post hoc analysis of Korean and non-Korean patients with IA (including baseline positive serum galactomannan [GM]). Immunocompromised patients ≥ 16 years with IA were randomised 1:1, combination or monotherapy, for ≥ 2 weeks' treatment. The primary endpoint was 6- and 12-week all-cause mortality (Korean modified intent-to-treat [mITT] population). Overall, 454 patients enrolled (Koreans: 56 [combination: 28, monotherapy: 28], non-Koreans: 398 [combination: 200, monotherapy: 198]). The mITT population comprised 40 Koreans (combination: 23; monotherapy: 17) and 237 non-Koreans (combination: 112; monotherapy: 125). Week 6 treatment difference in mortality rate between combination and monotherapy was -6.4% in non-Koreans. This reduction was more marked in Koreans (-22.4%). Week 12 difference in all-cause mortality between combination and monotherapy was -17.7% (Koreans) and -20.2% at Week 6 (Koreans; positive baseline GM). Week 6 mortality (Koreans [mITT]; baseline GM >0.5-2.0) was 0/13 (combination) and 2/6 (monotherapy). Serious adverse events were numerically higher for combination than monotherapy (Koreans: 57.1%, 46.4%; non-Koreans: 49.5%, 46.0%). In Koreans, combination therapy was associated with marginally better outcomes than monotherapy and more so than in non-Koreans.

摘要

这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验评估了伏立康唑+安尼达曲(联合)或伏立康唑+安慰剂(单药)治疗侵袭性曲霉病(IA;NCT00531479)的疗效、安全性和耐受性。我们报告了一项事后分析,纳入了 IA 患者(包括基线阳性血清半乳甘露聚糖[GM])的韩国和非韩国患者。≥16 岁免疫功能低下的 IA 患者按 1:1 比例随机分组,接受联合或单药治疗,疗程≥2 周。主要终点为 6 周和 12 周全因死亡率(韩国改良意向治疗[mITT]人群)。共有 454 例患者入组(韩国人:56[联合:28,单药:28],非韩国人:398[联合:200,单药:198])。mITT 人群包括 40 例韩国人(联合:23;单药:17)和 237 例非韩国人(联合:112;单药:125)。非韩国人联合治疗与单药治疗的死亡率在第 6 周的治疗差异为-6.4%。韩国人差异更明显(-22.4%)。联合治疗与单药治疗的全因死亡率在第 12 周的差异为-17.7%(韩国人),在第 6 周(韩国人;基线 GM>0.5-2.0)为-20.2%。第 6 周死亡率(韩国人[mITT];基线 GM>0.5-2.0)为联合治疗组 0/13(联合)和单药治疗组 2/6(单药)。联合治疗组不良事件发生率高于单药治疗组(韩国人:57.1%,46.4%;非韩国人:49.5%,46.0%)。在韩国人患者中,联合治疗组的结局优于单药治疗组,差异有统计学意义,且优于非韩国人患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e780/7003761/79b7b902357f/MYC-62-969-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验