Suppr超能文献

评估剪接突变的损伤效应:为诊断实验室验证一种体外方法。

Evaluation of damaging effects of splicing mutations: validation of an in vitro method for diagnostic laboratories.

机构信息

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Department of Cardiology, Padre A. Micone Hospital, ASL 3 "Genovese," Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Chim Acta. 2014 Sep 25;436:276-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.05.026. Epub 2014 Jun 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pre-mRNA splicing defects may have an important impact on clinical phenotype in several diseases, but often their pathogenic role is difficult to demonstrate. The aim of this study was to validate an in vitro method to assess the effects of putative splicing variants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied three novel variants in vitro using a novel minigene approach and compared results with in silico and ex vivo strategies from patient samples.

RESULTS

For the c.1146C>T variant in the LMNA gene, in vitro and ex vivo studies were concordant with the prediction obtained by in silico tools, confirming the loss of 13 bp at the end of exon 6. In the second case (c.1140+1G>A, SCN5A gene), in vitro experiments identified the insertion of 94 intronic bp in exon 9 as well as exon 9 skipping, but these results were not correctly predicted by ex vivo data and in silico tools. In the third case (c.1608+1C>T, LMNA gene) in vitro and ex vivo studies suggested the recognition of an exonic cryptic site leading to the loss of 29 bp in exon 9, not predicted by in silico analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our results revealed how in silico tools are often unreliable requiring "wet" RNA analysis. Since ex vivo studies are not always feasible, the use of an in vitro construct represents an efficient and useful method for the evaluation of damaging effects of unknown splicing variants, especially in diagnostic laboratories.

摘要

背景

前体 mRNA 剪接缺陷可能对几种疾病的临床表型有重要影响,但通常难以证明其致病作用。本研究旨在验证一种体外方法来评估潜在剪接变异体的影响。

材料与方法

我们使用新型小基因方法研究了三种新的变体,并将结果与患者样本的体外和体内策略进行了比较。

结果

对于 LMNA 基因中的 c.1146C>T 变体,体外和体内研究与体内工具预测的结果一致,证实了第 6 外显子末端丢失 13 个碱基。在第二个病例(c.1140+1G>A,SCN5A 基因)中,体外实验鉴定出 94 个内含子 bp 插入第 9 外显子以及外显子 9 跳跃,但这些结果与体外数据和体内工具预测的结果不一致。在第三个病例(c.1608+1C>T,LMNA 基因)中,体外和体内研究表明,识别了一个外显子内的隐蔽位点,导致第 9 外显子缺失 29 个碱基,这是体内分析预测不到的。

结论

我们的结果揭示了体内工具如何经常不可靠,需要进行“湿”RNA 分析。由于体内研究并不总是可行,因此使用体外构建体代表了一种评估未知剪接变异体的破坏性影响的有效且有用的方法,尤其是在诊断实验室中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验