Fang Qijuan, Freedenthal Stacey, Osman Augustine
Psychology Department, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2015 Feb;45(1):51-64. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12108. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
This study is the first to evaluate evidence for measurement invariance and the psychometric properties of the Suicide Resilience Inventory-25 (SRI-25; Osman et al., ) in college-age samples in both the United States and China. We found strong support for full measurement invariance of the three-factor structure of the SRI-25 in the U.S. (113 men and 238 women) and Chinese (121 men and 205 women) samples. In addition, we found that the U.S. sample scored significantly higher than the Chinese sample on all the individual scale scores. Composite scale reliability estimates ranged from moderate (ρ = .83) to high (ρ = .93) across the groups. Although not an aim of the current study, we examined estimates of internal consistency of the SRI-25 scales for men and women within each sample. Differential correlates of the SRI-25 scales were explored further for each sample. These results provide support for the use of the SRI-25 in U.S. and Chinese student samples.
本研究首次评估了美国和中国大学生样本中自杀恢复力量表-25(SRI-25;奥斯曼等人)的测量不变性证据和心理测量特性。我们发现,在美国(113名男性和238名女性)和中国(121名男性和205名女性)样本中,SRI-25三因素结构的完全测量不变性得到了有力支持。此外,我们发现美国样本在所有单个量表得分上均显著高于中国样本。各群体的综合量表信度估计值从中度(ρ = 0.83)到高度(ρ = 0.93)不等。虽然这并非本研究的目的,但我们检验了每个样本中男性和女性SRI-25量表的内部一致性估计值。针对每个样本进一步探讨了SRI-25量表的差异相关性。这些结果为SRI-25在美国和中国学生样本中的使用提供了支持。