UMR 1391 ISPA, INRA, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, Villenave d'Ornon, 33883 France.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2015 May;90(2):444-66. doi: 10.1111/brv.12119. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
It has been recognized for a long time that the overstorey composition of a forest partly determines its biological and physical-chemical functioning. Here, we review evidence of the influence of evergreen gymnosperm (EG) tree species and deciduous angiosperm (DA) tree species on the water balance, physical-chemical soil properties and biogeochemical cycling of carbon and nutrients. We used scientific publications based on experimental designs where all species grew on the same parent material and initial soil, and were similar in stage of stand development, former land use and current management. We present the current state of the art, define knowledge gaps, and briefly discuss how selection of tree species can be used to mitigate pollution or enhance accumulation of stable organic carbon in the soil. The presence of EGs generally induces a lower rate of precipitation input into the soil than DAs, resulting in drier soil conditions and lower water discharge. Soil temperature is generally not different, or slightly lower, under an EG canopy compared to a DA canopy. Chemical properties, such as soil pH, can also be significantly modified by taxonomic groups of tree species. Biomass production is usually similar or lower in DA stands than in stands of EGs. Aboveground production of dead organic matter appears to be of the same order of magnitude between tree species groups growing on the same site. Some DAs induce more rapid decomposition of litter than EGs because of the chemical properties of their tissues, higher soil moisture and favourable conditions for earthworms. Forest floors consequently tend to be thicker in EG forests compared to DA forests. Many factors, such as litter lignin content, influence litter decomposition and it is difficult to identify specific litter-quality parameters that distinguish litter decomposition rates of EGs from DAs. Although it has been suggested that DAs can result in higher accumulation of soil carbon stocks, evidence from field studies does not show any obvious trend. Further research is required to clarify if accumulation of carbon in soils (i.e. forest floor + mineral soil) is different between the two types of trees. Production of belowground dead organic matter appears to be of similar magnitude in DA and EG forests, and root decomposition rate lower under EGs than DAs. However there are some discrepancies and still are insufficient data about belowground pools and processes that require further research. Relatively larger amounts of nutrients enter the soil-plant biogeochemical cycle under the influence of EGs than DAs, but recycling of nutrients appears to be slightly enhanced by DAs. Understanding the mechanisms underlying forest ecosystem functioning is essential to predicting the consequences of the expected tree species migration under global change. This knowledge can also be used as a mitigation tool regarding carbon sequestration or management of surface waters because the type of tree species affects forest growth, carbon, water and nutrient cycling.
长期以来,人们一直认识到森林的上层组成部分在一定程度上决定了其生物和物理化学功能。在这里,我们回顾了常绿裸子植物(EG)树种和落叶被子植物(DA)树种对水分平衡、物理化学土壤特性以及碳和养分生物地球化学循环的影响的证据。我们使用了基于实验设计的科学出版物,其中所有物种都在相同的母质和初始土壤上生长,并且在林分发育阶段、前土地利用和当前管理方面相似。我们介绍了现状,定义了知识差距,并简要讨论了如何选择树种来减轻污染或增强土壤中稳定有机碳的积累。EG 的存在通常会导致进入土壤的降水输入率低于 DA,从而导致土壤条件干燥,排水量降低。与 DA 冠层相比,EG 冠层下的土壤温度通常没有差异,或者略低。土壤化学性质,如土壤 pH 值,也可以被树种的分类群显著改变。生物量的产生通常在 DA 林分中低于 EG 林分。在同一地点生长的树种组之间,地上死亡有机物质的产生似乎具有相同的数量级。由于组织的化学性质、较高的土壤湿度和蚯蚓的有利条件,一些 DA 树种诱导的凋落物分解速度比 EG 树种快。因此,森林底层在 EG 森林中通常比 DA 森林厚。许多因素,如凋落物木质素含量,影响凋落物分解,很难确定区分 EG 和 DA 凋落物分解速率的特定凋落物质量参数。尽管有人认为 DAs 会导致土壤碳储量的更高积累,但来自田间研究的证据并未显示出任何明显的趋势。需要进一步研究以澄清两种类型的树木之间土壤(即森林底层+矿物质土壤)中碳积累是否不同。地下死亡有机物质的产生在 DA 和 EG 森林中似乎具有相似的规模,并且 EG 下的根分解速率低于 DA。然而,关于地下池和过程仍存在一些差异,需要进一步研究。在 EG 的影响下,相对更多的养分进入土壤-植物生物地球化学循环,但 DA 略微增强了养分的再循环。了解森林生态系统功能的机制对于预测全球变化下预期树种迁移的后果至关重要。该知识还可以作为碳封存或地表水管理的缓解工具,因为树种类型会影响森林生长、碳、水和养分循环。