Muñoz E, Barrau L, Goldstein J, Benacquista T, Mulloy K, Wise L
Department of Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY 11042.
Chest. 1989 Jan;95(1):174-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.95.1.174.
Several federal bodies provide ongoing analyses of the Medicare DRG prospective hospital payment system. Many states are using DRG prospective "all payor systems" for hospital reimbursement (based on the federal model). In All Payor Systems, Medicare, Medicaid, Blue Cross and other commercial insurers pay by the DRG mode; New York State has been All Payor since 1/1/88. This study simulated DRG All Payor methods on a large sample (n = 1,662) of pulmonary medicine patients for a two-year period using both federal and New York DRG reimbursement now in effect at our hospital. Medicare patients had (on average) a longer hospital length of stay and total hospital cost compared to patients from Medicaid, Blue Cross, and other commercial payors. Medicare patients also had a greater severity of illness compared to patients from Blue Cross Medicaid or other payors. All payors, however, (Medicaid, Blue Cross, Medicare and commercial insurers) generated significant financial risk under the DRG All Payor scheme. These data suggest that federal, state, and private payors may be underreimbursing for the care of the hospitalized pulmonary medicine patients using the DRG prospective hospital payment scheme. Health care financing policy, as demonstrated in this study, may limit both the access and quality of care for many pulmonary medicine patients in the future.
几个联邦机构对医疗保险诊断相关分组(DRG)前瞻性医院支付系统进行持续分析。许多州正在使用基于联邦模式的DRG前瞻性“全支付方系统”来进行医院报销。在全支付方系统中,医疗保险、医疗补助、蓝十字和其他商业保险公司按DRG模式支付;纽约州自1988年1月1日起采用全支付方系统。本研究使用我院目前有效的联邦和纽约DRG报销方法,对一大样本(n = 1662)的肺病患者进行了为期两年的DRG全支付方方法模拟。与来自医疗补助、蓝十字和其他商业支付方的患者相比,医疗保险患者的平均住院时间更长,总住院费用更高。与来自蓝十字、医疗补助或其他支付方的患者相比,医疗保险患者的病情也更严重。然而,在DRG全支付方方案下,所有支付方(医疗补助、蓝十字、医疗保险和商业保险公司)都产生了重大的财务风险。这些数据表明,使用DRG前瞻性医院支付方案时,联邦、州和私人支付方可能对住院肺病患者的护理报销不足。如本研究所示,医疗保健融资政策未来可能会限制许多肺病患者获得医疗服务的机会和医疗服务质量。