Plumereau Fleur, Pinaud Frédéric, Roch Alexandra, Baufreton Christophe
Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Angers Cedex, France.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Angers Cedex, France CNRS UMR 6214, INSERM 1083, University of Angers, Angers Cedex, France
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Sep;19(3):474-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu190. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether patients with haematological malignancy (HM) who need cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) have a higher short-term mortality or a higher chance of disease progression secondary to CPB. Altogether, 107 papers were found using the reported search terms, but ultimately only eight were relevant to our subject. We found four case series and four case-control series. Most of the found papers were only short series. The largest series included 56 patients with HM and requiring CPB, suggesting that HM patients rarely require CPB surgery and/or are not operated on. Most of these studies showed that the overall postoperative morbidity rate was increased, reaching 50-60% of the patients. These comorbidities were mainly related to postoperative infections, bleeding and blood transfusions, which were highly significant. However, in most papers, the postoperative hospital stay was not different and the in-hospital mortality rate of HM patients was similar to that of healthy patients. One paper demonstrated that the time taken before initiating chemotherapy was longer in patients who underwent CPB surgery. No paper reported an acute change in blood disorders. Long-term mortality rates were not mentioned in some papers, but when it was stated, the HM patients' long-term mortality seemed not increased by using CPB surgery, with more than 80% survival at 3 years and 20-25% progression of the disease at 3 years. Although these study limitations are linked to the low-evidence levels in some of the papers used, haematological malignancies should not be considered a contraindication for cardiac CPB surgery.
一篇心脏外科领域的最佳证据主题文章是根据结构化方案撰写的。所探讨的问题是,需要进行体外循环(CPB)的血液系统恶性肿瘤(HM)患者是否具有更高的短期死亡率,或者因CPB继发疾病进展的几率更高。使用报告的搜索词共找到107篇论文,但最终只有8篇与我们的主题相关。我们找到了4个病例系列和4个病例对照系列。大多数找到的论文只是短篇系列。最大的系列包括56例患有HM且需要CPB的患者,这表明HM患者很少需要CPB手术和/或未接受手术治疗。这些研究大多表明,总体术后发病率有所增加,达到患者的50 - 60%。这些合并症主要与术后感染、出血和输血有关,具有高度显著性。然而,在大多数论文中,术后住院时间并无差异,HM患者的院内死亡率与健康患者相似。一篇论文表明,接受CPB手术的患者开始化疗前的时间更长。没有论文报告血液系统疾病的急性变化。一些论文未提及长期死亡率,但当提及长期死亡率时,HM患者使用CPB手术似乎并未增加长期死亡率,3年生存率超过80%,3年疾病进展率为20 - 25%。尽管这些研究局限性与所使用的一些论文的低证据水平有关,但血液系统恶性肿瘤不应被视为心脏CPB手术的禁忌症。