Oh Ah-Young, Hwang Jung-Won, Song In-Ae, Kim Mi-Hyun, Ryu Jung-Hee, Park Hee-Pyoung, Jeon Yeong-Tae, Do Sang-Hwan
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea ; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 May 16;14:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-36. eCollection 2014.
Prophylactic fluid preloading before spinal anesthesia has been a routine procedure to prevent maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery. Unlike colloid, timing of infusion of crystalloid may be important because of its short stay in intravascular space. We hypothesized that crystalloid loading just after intrathecal injection compared to preload would be more effective in preventing maternal hypotension.
In this prospective controlled study, sixty parturients were randomized to receive 15 ml/kg of crystalloid before (preload group) or after (coload group) intrathecal drug injection for spinal anesthesia. Hypotension was defined if systolic arterial pressure decreased below 80% of baseline and ephedrine was administered to treat hypotension. The incidence of hypotension and the total dose of ephedrine were checked. Blood pressure, heart rate and nausea before childbirth were assessed. Neonatal outcomes were evaluated with Apgar scores and umbilical blood gas analysis.
The incidence of hypotension was lower in the coload group compared to the preload group (53% vs. 83%, P = 0.026). The blood pressure showed the bigger drop during spinal anesthesia in the preload group (34 ± 13 vs. 25 ± 10 mmHg, P = 0.002) and smaller dose of ephedrine was required in the coload group (7.5 [0-30] vs. 15 [0-40] mg, P = 0.015). The incidence of nausea was also lower in the coload group (27% vs. 60%, P = 0.019). Neonatal outcome measures were comparable between two groups.
In case of using crystalloids for cesarean delivery, coload is more effective than preload for the prevention of maternal hypotension after spinal anesthesia.
Clinical Research Information Service KCT0000324 (Jan 12(th), 2012).
剖宫产时,在脊麻前预防性液体预负荷是预防产妇低血压的常规操作。与胶体不同,由于晶体在血管内空间停留时间短,其输注时机可能很重要。我们假设,与预负荷相比,在鞘内注射后立即进行晶体负荷在预防产妇低血压方面会更有效。
在这项前瞻性对照研究中,60名产妇被随机分为两组,一组在鞘内注射脊麻药物前(预负荷组)接受15ml/kg晶体液,另一组在鞘内注射脊麻药物后(负荷组)接受15ml/kg晶体液。若收缩压降至基线的80%以下则定义为低血压,并使用麻黄碱治疗低血压。检查低血压发生率和麻黄碱总剂量。评估分娩前的血压、心率和恶心情况。用阿氏评分和脐血气分析评估新生儿结局。
负荷组的低血压发生率低于预负荷组(53%对83%,P = 0.026)。预负荷组在脊麻期间血压下降幅度更大(34±13对25±10mmHg,P = 0.002),负荷组所需麻黄碱剂量更小(7.5[0 - 30]对15[0 - 40]mg,P = 0.015)。负荷组恶心发生率也更低(27%对60%,P = 0.019)。两组新生儿结局指标相当。
剖宫产使用晶体液时,负荷法在预防脊麻后产妇低血压方面比预负荷法更有效。
韩国临床研究信息服务中心KCT0000324(2012年1月12日)