Spindler H K, Mosenthin R, Eklund M
Institute of Animal Nutrition,University of Hohenheim,70593 Stuttgart,Germany.
Animal. 2014 Oct;8(10):1603-11. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114001438. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the standardized ileal digestibility (SID) and the basal ileal endogenous amino acid losses (IAAend) in barley for growing pigs. In total, 38 different barley treatments published in 26 peer-reviewed papers were used for the meta-analysis containing information on dietary composition including amino acid (AA) contents of the assay diets, and (or) barley samples, as well as apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of AA in barley. The SID of AA was determined by either correcting AID of AA for their IAAend or by regression analysis between the apparent ileal digestible and total dietary AA contents. The SID values obtained by correcting the AID values for their IAAend amounted to 70%, 77%, 74% and 63% for Lys, Met, Thr and Trp, whereas those based on regression analysis method were 82%, 82%, 69% and 55%, respectively. Estimates of basal ileal endogenous loss of CP in ileal digesta varied considerably and averaged 11.84 g/kg dry matter intake (DMI), whereas IAAend for indispensable AA ranged from 0.05 g/kg DMI for Trp to 1.90 g/kg DMI for Leu. In most cases, these estimates were considerably higher than previously reported values for IAAend. The results of the present regression analysis indicate for most AA higher SID values compared with SID of most AA that were obtained by correcting AID values for IAAend. In view of the observed high variations in IAAend and the low CP content of the barley samples, estimating SID of AA based on literature data by means of the regression method may improve accuracy of SID coefficients for barley. In contrast, transformation of AID values into their corresponding SID values by using a constant correction factor for IAAend adds an additional source of error, thereby reducing the precision in estimating SID of AA.
本荟萃分析旨在估算生长猪大麦中标准化回肠消化率(SID)和基础回肠内源氨基酸损失(IAAend)。总共使用了26篇同行评审论文中发表的38种不同大麦处理方法进行荟萃分析,这些论文包含日粮组成信息,包括测定日粮的氨基酸(AA)含量和(或)大麦样品,以及大麦中AA的表观回肠消化率(AID)。AA的SID通过将AA的AID校正其IAAend来确定,或者通过表观回肠可消化AA含量与日粮总AA含量之间的回归分析来确定。通过将AID值校正其IAAend获得的SID值,赖氨酸、蛋氨酸、苏氨酸和色氨酸分别为70%、77%、74%和63%,而基于回归分析方法的SID值分别为82%、82%、69%和55%。回肠食糜中CP的基础回肠内源损失估计差异很大,平均为11.84 g/kg干物质摄入量(DMI),而必需AA的IAAend范围从色氨酸的0.05 g/kg DMI到亮氨酸的1.90 g/kg DMI。在大多数情况下,这些估计值远高于先前报道的IAAend值。本回归分析结果表明,与通过将AID值校正IAAend获得的大多数AA的SID相比,大多数AA的SID值更高。鉴于观察到的IAAend高度变化和大麦样品的低CP含量,通过回归方法基于文献数据估算AA的SID可能会提高大麦SID系数的准确性。相比之下,通过使用IAAend的恒定校正因子将AID值转换为相应的SID值会增加额外的误差来源,从而降低估算AA的SID的精度。