UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Jan 15;77(2):116-26. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 May 5.
Schizophrenia is associated with impaired face processing. N170 and N250 are two event-related potentials that have been studied in relation to face processing in schizophrenia, but the results have been mixed. The aim of this article was to conduct a meta-analysis of N170 and N250 in schizophrenia to evaluate trends and resolve the inconsistencies.
Twenty-one studies of N170 (n = 438 schizophrenia patients, n = 418 control subjects) and six studies of N250 (n = 149 schizophrenia patients, n = 151 control subjects) were evaluated. Hedges' g was calculated for each study, and the overall weighted mean effect size (ES) was calculated for N170 and N250. Homogeneity of the ES distributions, potential publication bias, and impact of potential moderators were also assessed.
The amplitude of both N170 and N250 to face stimuli was smaller in patients than control subjects (N170 ES = .64; N250 ES = .49; ps < .001). The distributions of the ES were homogeneous (ps > .90), and there was no indication of a publication bias. We found no significant effect of task requirements regarding judgments of the face stimuli. Moreover, we found no significant difference between the ES for N170 and N250.
Though findings of individual studies have been mixed, the results of the meta-analysis strongly support disruption of N170 and N250 in schizophrenia. The comparable effect sizes across the two waveforms suggest that the well-established behavioral deficit in face emotion processing is mirrored in an underlying neural impairment for processing faces.
精神分裂症与面部处理能力受损有关。N170 和 N250 是两种与精神分裂症相关的事件相关电位,已经有研究针对它们与面部处理的关系进行了研究,但结果不一。本文的目的是对面部处理中的 N170 和 N250 进行荟萃分析,以评估趋势并解决不一致性。
评估了 21 项关于 N170 的研究(n = 438 名精神分裂症患者,n = 418 名对照组)和 6 项关于 N250 的研究(n = 149 名精神分裂症患者,n = 151 名对照组)。对每项研究均计算了 Hedges'g,并计算了 N170 和 N250 的总体加权平均效应量(ES)。还评估了 ES 分布的同质性、潜在的发表偏倚以及潜在调节因素的影响。
与对照组相比,患者对面部刺激的 N170 和 N250 振幅均较小(N170 ES =.64;N250 ES =.49;p <.001)。ES 的分布具有同质性(p >.90),且不存在发表偏倚的迹象。我们发现,对面部刺激进行判断的任务要求没有显著影响。此外,我们没有发现 N170 和 N250 的 ES 之间存在显著差异。
尽管个别研究的结果存在差异,但荟萃分析的结果强烈支持精神分裂症中 N170 和 N250 的中断。两种波形的效应量相当,这表明对面部情绪处理的既定行为缺陷反映了面部处理的潜在神经损伤。