Aulich D
Department of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, University of Nijmegen The Netherlands.
Behav Processes. 1976 Oct;1(2):153-64. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(76)90035-8.
To test the assumption that dark preference in rats can serve as a measure of emotionality, dark preference was compared with ambulation and defacation in the open field. One group of 80-days-old male rats was handled for seven days; another group remained undisturbed. All animals were tested on each of five successive days in both a light-dark preference situation and an open field. Handled rats ambulated more in the field and stayed less time in the dark than non-handled ones. Significant negative correlations were found for the different days between open field ambulation and dark preference. Correlations between dark preference and open field defacation were positive except on day one. From the first to the second trial dark preference increased in both groups while open field ambulation decreased. The results were considered to support the hypothesis of dark preference as a measure of emotionality. In a second study an investigation was made as to whether high initial activity in a new situation is brought about by exploration or by an escape tendency. Again one group of male albino rats was handled. During testing, half of the handled and half of the non-handled rats had the chance of escaping from the open field into the adjacent home cage. From there the animals had the possibility of re-entering the field. The second half of each group had to stay in the field. These latter animals showed a remarkable decrease in ambulation from the first to the second trial. Rats which had access to their home cages seldom re-entered the field in the first trial. In later trials, however, ambulation in the field increased. Non-handled rats needed more trials before they started investigating the field. It was concluded that this result gives more support to an explanation of initial activity in terms of escape behaviour.
为了验证大鼠对黑暗环境的偏好可作为情绪衡量指标这一假设,将大鼠对黑暗环境的偏好与旷场实验中的行走和排便情况进行了比较。一组80日龄雄性大鼠接受了7天的抚摸处理;另一组则未受干扰。所有动物在连续5天内分别接受明暗偏好实验和旷场实验。与未接受抚摸处理的大鼠相比,接受抚摸处理的大鼠在旷场中行走更多,在黑暗环境中停留时间更短。在不同日期,旷场行走与黑暗偏好之间存在显著的负相关。除第一天外,黑暗偏好与旷场排便之间的相关性为正。从第一次试验到第二次试验,两组大鼠的黑暗偏好均增加,而旷场行走减少。这些结果被认为支持了将黑暗偏好作为情绪衡量指标的假设。在第二项研究中,调查了在新环境中最初的高活动水平是由探索还是逃避倾向引起的。同样,一组雄性白化大鼠接受了抚摸处理。在测试过程中,一半接受抚摸处理的大鼠和一半未接受抚摸处理的大鼠有机会从旷场逃到相邻的家笼中。从那里,动物有可能重新进入旷场。每组的另一半必须留在旷场中。这些动物在第一次试验到第二次试验期间行走显著减少。有机会进入家笼的大鼠在第一次试验中很少重新进入旷场。然而,在随后的试验中,旷场中的行走增加。未接受抚摸处理的大鼠在开始探索旷场之前需要更多次试验。得出的结论是,这一结果更支持用逃避行为来解释最初的活动。