Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌患者术前腋窝淋巴结细针穿刺活检:临床应用、诊断准确性及潜在陷阱

Preoperative fine needle aspiration of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer: clinical utility, diagnostic accuracy and potential pitfalls.

作者信息

Gilani Syed M, Fathallah Lamia, Al-Khafaji Basim M

机构信息

Department of Pathology, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, Mich., USA.

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 2014;58(3):248-54. doi: 10.1159/000362682. Epub 2014 Jun 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of axillary lymph node fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in breast cancer and correlates it with clinical parameters/outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 91 females underwent FNA of axillary lymph nodes at our institution from January 2007 to February 2013. The cases were classified as 'positive', 'negative for malignancy' and 'nondiagnostic'.

RESULTS

Forty-six cases (50.5%) had a histologic follow-up (4.4 ± 3.1 months); of these, 22 (47.8%) were true positive, 7 (15.2%) were true negative, 2 (4.3%) were false negative, 5 (11%) were false positive and 10 (21.7%) were nondiagnostic. However, cytological review of all false positive and false negative cases confirmed the presence or absence of tumor, respectively. All false positive cases had undergone preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with no residual tumor present, and a treatment effect identified only histologically. Meanwhile, the 2 false negative cases involved micrometastasis (≤ 1.5 mm). Thus, if we exclude these false positive cases (complete responders), then the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 91.7, 100, 100 and 77.8%, respectively. All preoperative FNA-positive axillary lymph nodes were spared from sentinel lymph node biopsy except for 3 of 27 (11.1%).

CONCLUSION

We suggest that axillary lymph node FNA is a highly sensitive technique with a low false negative rate (4.3%) and a diagnostic accuracy of 93.5%.

摘要

目的

本研究评估腋窝淋巴结细针穿刺(FNA)细胞学检查对乳腺癌的诊断准确性,并将其与临床参数/结果相关联。

研究设计

2007年1月至2013年2月期间,共有91名女性在本机构接受了腋窝淋巴结FNA检查。病例被分类为“阳性”、“恶性阴性”和“非诊断性”。

结果

46例(50.5%)进行了组织学随访(4.4±3.1个月);其中,22例(47.8%)为真阳性,7例(15.2%)为真阴性,2例(4.3%)为假阴性,5例(11%)为假阳性,10例(21.7%)为非诊断性。然而,对所有假阳性和假阴性病例的细胞学复查分别证实了肿瘤的存在或不存在。所有假阳性病例均接受了术前新辅助化疗,无残留肿瘤,且仅在组织学上确定了治疗效果。同时,2例假阴性病例涉及微转移(≤1.5mm)。因此,如果排除这些假阳性病例(完全缓解者),则敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为91.7%、100%、100%和77.8%。除27例中的3例(11.1%)外,所有术前FNA阳性的腋窝淋巴结均未进行前哨淋巴结活检。

结论

我们认为腋窝淋巴结FNA是一种高度敏感的技术,假阴性率低(4.3%),诊断准确性为93.5%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验