• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于男男性行为者(MSM)延期献血的共同监管观点。

A shared regulatory perspective on deferral from blood donation of men who have sex with men (MSM).

作者信息

Epstein J, Ganz P R, Seitz R, Jutzi M, Schaerer C, Michaud G, Agbanyo F, Smith G, Prosser I, Heiden M, Saint-Marie I, Oualikene-Gonin W, Hamaguchi I, Yasuda N

机构信息

Office of Blood Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

出版信息

Vox Sang. 2014 Nov;107(4):416-9. doi: 10.1111/vox.12166. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1111/vox.12166
PMID:24924302
Abstract

National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) establish deferral criteria for donors with risk factors for transfusion transmissible infections (TTI). In most jurisdictions, epidemiological data show that men who have sex with men (MSM) have a significantly higher rate of TTI than the general population. Nevertheless, changes from an indefinite donor deferral for MSM have been considered in many countries in response to concerns over a perceived discrimination and questioning of the scientific need. Changes to MSM donor deferral criteria should be based on sound scientific evidence. Safety of transfusion recipients should be the first priority, and stakeholder input should be sought.

摘要

国家监管机构(NRAs)为具有输血传播感染(TTI)风险因素的献血者制定延期标准。在大多数司法管辖区,流行病学数据显示,男男性行为者(MSM)的TTI发生率明显高于普通人群。然而,鉴于对感知到的歧视以及对科学必要性的质疑的担忧,许多国家已考虑改变对MSM无限期延期献血的政策。对MSM献血延期标准的改变应基于可靠的科学证据。输血受者的安全应是首要优先事项,并且应征求利益相关者的意见。

相似文献

1
A shared regulatory perspective on deferral from blood donation of men who have sex with men (MSM).关于男男性行为者(MSM)延期献血的共同监管观点。
Vox Sang. 2014 Nov;107(4):416-9. doi: 10.1111/vox.12166. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
2
Sexual risk behaviour and donor deferral in Europe.欧洲的性风险行为与献血者延期
Vox Sang. 2014 Nov;107(4):420-7. doi: 10.1111/vox.12179. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
3
Donor deferral policies for men who have sex with men: where are we today?男男性行为者的献血延期政策:我们如今处于什么状况?
Curr Opin Hematol. 2016 Nov;23(6):568-572. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000275.
4
Relative risk of reducing the lifetime blood donation deferral for men who have had sex with men versus currently tolerated transfusion risks.与目前可接受的输血风险相比,减少男男性行为者终身献血延期的相对风险。
Transfus Med Rev. 2011 Jan;25(1):47-60. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2010.08.006.
5
The beliefs and willingness of men who have sex with men to comply with a one-year blood donation deferral policy: a cross-sectional study.男男性行为者遵守一年延期献血政策的信念和意愿:一项横断面研究。
Transfusion. 2017 Sep;57(9):2234-2239. doi: 10.1111/trf.14217. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
6
Attitudes and perceptions among men having sex with men towards a new non-deferral blood donation policy in Israel.以色列男男性行为者对一项新的非延期献血政策的态度和看法。
Vox Sang. 2019 May;114(4):310-316. doi: 10.1111/vox.12766. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
7
Is having sex with other men a risk factor for transfusion-transmissible infections in male blood donors in Western countries? A systematic review.在西方国家,男男性行为是否是男性献血者输血传播感染的一个风险因素?一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0122523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122523. eCollection 2015.
8
The risk of allowing blood donation from men having sex with men after a temporary deferral: predictions versus reality.暂时推迟后允许男男性行为者献血的风险:预测与现实
Transfusion. 2016 Jun;56(6 Pt 2):1603-7. doi: 10.1111/trf.13541. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
9
Men who have sex with men and risk for transfusion-transmissible infections in blood donors in Western countries: A systematic review update.西方国家男男性行为者和输血传播感染风险的献血者:系统评价更新。
Vox Sang. 2023 Sep;118(9):709-720. doi: 10.1111/vox.13482. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
10
Donors' perspectives on self-deferral of men having sex with men from blood donation.供者对男男性行为者自延期献血的看法。
Transfusion. 2013 Oct;53(10 Pt 2):2441-8. doi: 10.1111/trf.12365. Epub 2013 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Sexual risk behavior questions: Understanding and mitigating donor discomfort.性行为风险行为问题:理解和减轻供者不适。
Transfusion. 2022 Feb;62(2):355-364. doi: 10.1111/trf.16755. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
2
Blood donation deferral policies among men who have sex with men in Brazil.巴西男男性行为者的献血延期政策。
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2019 Apr-Jun;41(2):164-168. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
3
Blood donor selection in European Union directives: room for improvement.欧盟指令中的献血者选择:仍有改进空间。
Blood Transfus. 2016 Mar;14(2):101-8. doi: 10.2450/2015.0148-15. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
4
Is having sex with other men a risk factor for transfusion-transmissible infections in male blood donors in Western countries? A systematic review.在西方国家,男男性行为是否是男性献血者输血传播感染的一个风险因素?一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0122523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122523. eCollection 2015.