• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Individual growth curve standards for fetal head and abdominal circumferences: effect of the type of measurement on growth prediction.

作者信息

Stefos T, Deter R L

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030.

出版信息

J Clin Ultrasound. 1989 Jan;17(1):33-6. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870170107.

DOI:10.1002/jcu.1870170107
PMID:2492547
Abstract

Head and abdominal circumferences (HC, AC) can be measured directly or estimated from diameters. Accurate prediction of circumference growth after 26 weeks depends on growth model specification and the quality of the circumference measurement method used. To evaluate the effect of the method of measurement, direct and estimated HC and AC values from 20 normal fetuses, obtained between 15 and 38 weeks, were used to determine two pairs of functions for specifying HC and AC growth models. The two HC and AC data sets and pairs of model specification functions were used in various combinations to determine HC and AC growth models, to predict growth after 26 weeks, and to compare predicted values to actual measurements. Systematic and random prediction errors were determined for each combination. For HC no differences in either type of error were found. Similar results were obtained for AC with one exception, a statistically significant difference in systematic error between the directly measured circumferences - model specification based on estimated values combination and the estimated circumferences - model specification based on directly measured values combination. These results indicate that the prediction of future HC and AC growth is not significantly affected by the type of circumference measurement procedure used except in extreme cases where circumference measurements are made on parts of the body that can be easily distorted.

摘要

相似文献

1
Individual growth curve standards for fetal head and abdominal circumferences: effect of the type of measurement on growth prediction.
J Clin Ultrasound. 1989 Jan;17(1):33-6. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870170107.
2
Fetal head and abdominal circumferences: I. Evaluation of measurement errors.
J Clin Ultrasound. 1982 Oct;10(8):357-63. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870100803.
3
Individual growth curve standards in triplets: prediction of third-trimester growth and birth characteristics.三胞胎个体生长曲线标准:孕晚期生长及出生特征的预测
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Sep;78(3 Pt 1):379-84.
4
Fetal head and abdominal circumferences: II. A critical re-evaluation of the relationship to menstrual age.
J Clin Ultrasound. 1982 Oct;10(8):365-72. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870100804.
5
[Ultrasound measurement of fetal head and body sizes in the assessment of fetal growth].
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984 Jul;36(7):1034-42.
6
The correlation between ultrasonic manual and automatic measurements of foetal head and abdominal circumferences.胎儿头部和腹围超声手动测量与自动测量之间的相关性。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2007 Jul;57(7):352-5.
7
Prediction of normal fetal growth by the Rossavik growth model using two scans before 27 weeks, menstrual age.使用Rossavik生长模型,通过孕27周前的两次扫描及月经龄来预测正常胎儿生长情况。
J Clin Ultrasound. 1989 May;17(4):237-43. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870170402.
8
Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur.胎儿头部、腹部和股骨生长的纵向参考图表。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Aug;127(2):172-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.10.004. Epub 2005 Nov 11.
9
Transvaginal sonography for fetal measurement in early pregnancy.经阴道超声检查用于孕早期胎儿测量。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Jan;99(1):38-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb14389.x.
10
Influence of the interval between time points on individual fetal growth curve standards derived from Rossavik models and two ultrasound scans before 26 weeks, menstrual age.孕周26周前基于Rossavik模型和两次超声扫描得出的时间点间隔对个体胎儿生长曲线标准的影响。
J Clin Ultrasound. 1989 May;17(4):245-50. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870170403.

引用本文的文献

1
Morphological and functional evaluation of normal and abnormal fetal growth by ultrasonography.超声检查对正常和异常胎儿生长的形态学及功能评估
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2009 Sep;36(3):105-17. doi: 10.1007/s10396-009-0224-4. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
2
Individualized fetal growth assessment: critical evaluation of key concepts in the specification of third trimester size trajectories.个体化胎儿生长评估:对孕晚期大小轨迹规范中关键概念的批判性评价
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Apr;27(6):543-51. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.833904. Epub 2013 Sep 12.