Mikulis D J, Chisin R, Wismer G L, Buxton R B, Weber A L, Davis K R, Rosen B
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1989 Jan-Feb;10(1):157-64.
Standard T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo acquisitions were compared with T1- and T2-weighted phase-contrast techniques in a series of 10 consecutive patients with parotid masses to assess the role of phase-contrast methods in the evaluation of lesions in the parotid fossa. Greater tissue-lesion contrast was obtained with phase-contrast methods in nine of 10 cases, allowing improved lesion visualization; however, an increase in lesion detectability was not observed in this series. Standard MR imaging methods are sufficient for imaging the parotid region in most cases, but can be quite time-consuming. Recommended screening of the parotid fossa that optimizes tissue-lesion contrast, lesion detectability, and imaging time is performed by combining a standard T1-weighted acquisition with a T1- or T2-weighted phase-contrast acquisition. Selection of a T1- or T2-weighted phase-contrast acquisition is determined by the T1 characteristics of the lesion.
在连续10例腮腺肿块患者中,将标准T1加权和T2加权自旋回波采集与T1加权和T2加权相位对比技术进行比较,以评估相位对比方法在腮腺窝病变评估中的作用。10例中有9例采用相位对比方法获得了更大的组织病变对比度,从而改善了病变的可视化;然而,在本系列中未观察到病变可检测性的增加。标准的磁共振成像方法在大多数情况下足以对腮腺区域进行成像,但可能相当耗时。推荐通过将标准T1加权采集与T1或T2加权相位对比采集相结合,对腮腺窝进行优化组织病变对比度、病变可检测性和成像时间的筛查。T1或T2加权相位对比采集的选择取决于病变的T1特征。