• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[因呼吸窘迫综合征导致的极早产儿使用InSure方法失败的危险因素]

[Risk factors for the failure of the InSure method in very preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome].

作者信息

Li Ting, Jiang Hong, Liu Dong-Yun, Li Xiang-Hong

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jun;16(6):610-3.

PMID:24927437
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the risk factors for the failure of the InSure method in very preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

METHODS

Seventy-one very preterm infants with RDS treated with InSure method were enrolled. These infants were categorized into two groups: InSure success (42 cases) and InSure failure (29 cases). The differences in basic information were compared between the two groups, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for InSure failure.

RESULTS

The failure rate of the InSure method was 41%. The failure group were much lower in the birth weight, the antenatal steroids utilization rate and the vaginal delivery rate than the success group (P<0.05). The incidence of patent ductus arteriosus in the failure group was significantly higher than in the success group (P<0.05). PaO2, PaO2/FiO2 and PaO2/PAO2 in the failure group were significantly lower than in the success group (P<0.05). PaCO2 in the failure group was much higher than in the success group (P<0.05). Further logistic regression analysis showed that birth weight <1 150 g (OR=22.240 95%CI=2.124-232.901), PaCO2>54 mm Hg(OR=9.360, 95%CI=1.958-44.741, and PaO2/FiO2 <195 (OR=6.570, 95%CI=1.027-42.003), were the independmend risk factors for InSure failure. Furthermore, the duration of oxygen therapy, the total time of hospitalization and the incidence of BPD in the failure group were much longer and higher than in the success group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Low birth weight, elevated PaCO2 and low PaO2/PiO2 ratio are the risk factors for the failure of the InSure method in very preterm infants.

摘要

目的

研究因舒法(InSure)用于极早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)失败的危险因素。

方法

纳入71例采用因舒法治疗的极早产儿RDS患儿。这些患儿被分为两组:因舒法成功组(42例)和因舒法失败组(29例)。比较两组患儿的基本信息差异,并采用logistic回归分析确定因舒法失败的危险因素。

结果

因舒法的失败率为41%。失败组患儿的出生体重、产前类固醇使用率和阴道分娩率均显著低于成功组(P<0.05)。失败组动脉导管未闭的发生率显著高于成功组(P<0.05)。失败组的动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)和肺泡动脉氧分压差(PaO2/PAO2)均显著低于成功组(P<0.05)。失败组的动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)显著高于成功组(P<0.05)。进一步的logistic回归分析显示,出生体重<1150 g(比值比[OR]=22.240,95%置信区间[CI]=2.124-232.901)、PaCO2>54 mmHg(OR=9.360,95%CI=1.958-44.741)以及PaO2/FiO2<195(OR=6.570,95%CI=1.027-42.003)是因舒法失败的独立危险因素。此外,失败组的氧疗时间、总住院时间和支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的发生率均显著长于和高于成功组(P<0.05)。

结论

低出生体重、高PaCO2和低PaO2/FiO2比值是极早产儿因舒法失败的危险因素。

相似文献

1
[Risk factors for the failure of the InSure method in very preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome].[因呼吸窘迫综合征导致的极早产儿使用InSure方法失败的危险因素]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jun;16(6):610-3.
2
Risk factors of the failure of surfactant treatment by transient intubation during nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants.早产儿经鼻持续气道正压通气期间短暂插管进行表面活性剂治疗失败的危险因素。
Am J Perinatol. 2008 Nov;25(10):647-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1090590. Epub 2008 Oct 7.
3
Risk factors for INSURE failure in preterm infants.早产儿INSURE失败的危险因素。
Minerva Pediatr. 2010 Jun;62(3 Suppl 1):19-20.
4
Efficacy of INSURE during nasal CPAP in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.持续气道正压通气期间INSURE策略用于呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的疗效
Minerva Pediatr. 2013 Apr;65(2):187-92.
5
Risk factors for intubation-surfactant-extubation (INSURE) failure and multiple INSURE strategy in preterm infants.经口插管-表面活性物质-拔管(INSURE)失败的危险因素和早产儿多次 INSURE 策略。
Early Hum Dev. 2012 Mar;88 Suppl 1:S3-4. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.12.019. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
6
Variables associated with the early failure of nasal CPAP in very low birth weight infants.与极低出生体重儿鼻持续气道正压通气早期失败相关的变量。
J Pediatr. 2005 Sep;147(3):341-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.04.062.
7
Is it feasible to identify preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome for early extubation to continuous positive airway pressure post-surfactant treatment during retrieval?在转运过程中,对于接受表面活性剂治疗后的呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿,识别出适合早期拔管并给予持续气道正压通气的患儿是否可行?
J Paediatr Child Health. 2015 Mar;51(3):321-7. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12724. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
8
[Efficacy and safety of inhalation of pulmonary surfactant using vibrating mesh nebulizers combined with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome].振动筛孔雾化器联合经鼻持续气道正压通气吸入肺表面活性物质治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效及安全性
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Jan;34(1):80-84. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210602-00815.
9
Minimally invasive surfactant therapy with a gastric tube is as effective as the intubation, surfactant, and extubation technique in preterm babies.在早产儿中,采用胃管进行微创表面活性剂治疗与插管、注入表面活性剂和拔管技术的效果相同。
Acta Paediatr. 2014 Jun;103(6):e229-33. doi: 10.1111/apa.12611. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
10
Continuous positive airway pressure failure in preterm infants: incidence, predictors and consequences.早产儿持续气道正压通气失败:发生率、预测因素和后果。
Neonatology. 2013;104(1):8-14. doi: 10.1159/000346460. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Intubation-Surfactant: Extubation on Continuous Positive Pressure Ventilation. Who are the Best Candidates?插管-表面活性剂:持续正压通气下拔管。最佳候选人是谁?
J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2016 May 9;2(2):73-79. doi: 10.1515/jccm-2016-0010. eCollection 2016 Apr.