Suppr超能文献

用于急性心肌梗死诊断的高敏肌钙蛋白T检测:一项经济学评估

High-sensitive troponin T assay for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: an economic evaluation.

作者信息

Vaidya Anil, Severens Johan L, Bongaerts Brenda W C, Cleutjens Kitty B J M, Nelemans Patty J, Hofstra Leonard, van Dieijen-Visser Marja, Biessen Erik A L

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, Maastricht 6202 AZ, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014 Jun 13;14:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-14-77.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delayed diagnosis and treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) has a major adverse impact on prognosis in terms of both morbidity and mortality. Since conventional cardiac Troponin assays have a low sensitivity for diagnosing AMI in the first hours after myocardial necrosis, high-sensitive assays have been developed. The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of a high-sensitive Troponin T assay (hsTnT), alone or combined with the heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) assay in comparison with the conventional cardiac Troponin (cTnT) assay for the diagnosis of AMI in patients presenting to the hospital with chest pain.

METHODS

We performed a cost-utility analysis (quality adjusted life years-QALYs) and a cost effectiveness analysis (life years gained-LYGs) based on a decision analytic model, using a health care perspective in the Dutch context and a life time time-horizon. The robustness of model predictions was explored using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

For a life time incremental cost of 30.70 Euros, use of hsTnT over conventional cTnT results in gain of 0.006 Life Years and 0.004 QALY. It should be noted here that hsTnT is a diagnostic intervention which costs only 4.39 Euros/test more than the cTnT test. The ICER generated with the use of hsTnT based diagnostic strategy comparing with the use of a cTnT-based strategy, is 4945 Euros per LYG and 7370 Euros per QALY. The hsTnT strategy has the highest probability of being cost effective at thresholds between 8000 and 20000 Euros per QALY. The combination of hsTnT and h-FABP strategy's probability of being cost effective remains lower than hsTnT at all willingness to pay thresholds.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis suggests that hsTnT assay is a very cost effective diagnostic tool relative to conventional TnT assay. Combination of hsTnT and H-FABP does not offer any additional economic and health benefit over hsTnT test alone.

摘要

背景

急性心肌梗死(AMI)的延迟诊断和治疗在发病率和死亡率方面对预后有重大不利影响。由于传统心肌肌钙蛋白检测在心肌坏死后最初几小时对AMI诊断的敏感性较低,因此已开发出高敏检测方法。本研究的目的是评估单独使用高敏肌钙蛋白T检测(hsTnT)或与心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白(H-FABP)检测联合使用相对于传统心肌肌钙蛋白(cTnT)检测在诊断因胸痛入院患者的AMI时的成本效益。

方法

我们基于决策分析模型进行了成本效用分析(质量调整生命年-QALYs)和成本效益分析(获得的生命年-LYGs),采用荷兰背景下的医疗保健视角和终身时间范围。使用单因素和概率敏感性分析探索模型预测的稳健性。

结果

对于30.70欧元的终身增量成本,使用hsTnT而非传统cTnT可带来0.006生命年和0.004 QALY的收益。在此应注意,hsTnT是一种诊断干预措施,每次检测仅比cTnT检测多花费4.39欧元。与使用基于cTnT的策略相比,使用基于hsTnT的诊断策略产生的增量成本效果比为每获得一个生命年4945欧元,每获得一个QALY 7370欧元。hsTnT策略在每QALY 8000至20000欧元的阈值之间具有最高的成本效益概率。在所有支付意愿阈值下,hsTnT和h-FABP联合策略的成本效益概率仍低于hsTnT。

结论

我们的分析表明,相对于传统TnT检测,hsTnT检测是一种非常具有成本效益的诊断工具。hsTnT和H-FABP联合使用相对于单独使用hsTnT检测并未提供任何额外的经济和健康益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/960f/4065542/6a172d8c3253/1471-2261-14-77-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验