Suppr超能文献

Mini-FLOTAC法、加藤厚涂片法和麦克马斯特法:三种方法,一个目标;阿根廷北部的亮点

Mini-FLOTAC, Kato-Katz and McMaster: three methods, one goal; highlights from north Argentina.

作者信息

Barda Beatrice, Cajal Pamela, Villagran Eliana, Cimino Ruben, Juarez Marisa, Krolewiecki Alejandro, Rinaldi Laura, Cringoli Giuseppe, Burioni Roberto, Albonico Marco

机构信息

Laboratory of Microbiology San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Parasit Vectors. 2014 Jun 14;7:271. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-271.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Copro-parasitological diagnosis is still a challenge in management of helminth infections at individual and community levels in resource-limited settings.The aim of our study was to compare the performance of three quantitative techniques: Kato-Katz, McMaster and Mini-FLOTAC methids. The study was carried out in Oran, Northern Argentina.

METHODS

200 schoolchildren were enrolled to provide a single stool sample, which was tested for helminth infections with Kato-Katz, McMaster and Mini-FLOTAC methods. The Mini-FLOTAC was performed with two flotation solutions (FS2 saturated saline and FS7 zinc sulphate). Preparation and reading time for each of the three methods was calculated both when processing single and multiple samples.

RESULTS

Out of 193 schoolchildren examined, 40% were positive for any helminth infection by any method; the most prevalent was Hymenolepis nana (23%) followed by Ascaris lumbricoides (17%) and a third group of less prevalent helminths: Enterobius vermicularis, Trichuris trichiura and hookworms (11% all together). Mini-FLOTAC FS2 was more sensitive than FS7 for H. nana (93% vs 78%) and for other helminths (85% vs 80%), whereas FS7 was more sensitive for A. lumbricoides (87% vs 61%). Kato-Katz method was more sensitive than McMaster method for A. lumbricoides (84% vs 48%) and for other helminths (48% vs 43%) except for H. nana (49% vs 61%). As for egg counts, Mini-FLOTAC FS2 reported 904 eggs per gram of faeces (EPG) for H. nana (vs 457 with McMaster and 111 with Kato-Katz) and 1177 EPG for A. lumbricoides (vs 1315 with Kato-Katz and 995 with McMaster); FS2 detected the highest EPG for both H.nana and A.lumbricoides (904 vs 568 and 1177 vs 643 respectively), the differences were not statistically significant. The technique feasibility was calculated: Kato-Katz mean time was 48 minutes/sample, Mini-FLOTAC 13 minutes/sample and McMaster 7 minutes/sample. However, especially for Kato-Katz and Mini-FLOTAC, the mean time (min/sample) decreased significantly when processing multiple samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Mini-FLOTAC is a promising technique for helminth diagnosis, it is more sensitive than Kato-Katz and McMaster for H. nana and as sensitive as Kato-Katz and more sensitive than McMaster for A. lumbricoides identification. Egg counts differences although relevant, did not reach statistical significance.

摘要

背景

在资源有限的环境中,粪便寄生虫学诊断在个体和社区层面的蠕虫感染管理中仍然是一项挑战。我们研究的目的是比较三种定量技术的性能:加藤厚涂片法、麦克马斯特法和Mini-FLOTAC法。该研究在阿根廷北部的奥兰进行。

方法

招募200名学童,提供一份粪便样本,用加藤厚涂片法、麦克马斯特法和Mini-FLOTAC法检测蠕虫感染情况。Mini-FLOTAC法使用两种浮选液(FS2饱和盐水和FS7硫酸锌)。计算处理单个样本和多个样本时三种方法各自的制备和读数时间。

结果

在193名接受检查的学童中,40%通过任何一种方法检测出感染了任何一种蠕虫;最常见的是微小膜壳绦虫(23%),其次是蛔虫(17%),还有一组不太常见的蠕虫:蛲虫、鞭虫和钩虫(总计11%)。Mini-FLOTAC FS2对微小膜壳绦虫(93%对78%)和其他蠕虫(85%对80%)的检测比FS7更敏感,而FS7对蛔虫(87%对61%)的检测更敏感。加藤厚涂片法对蛔虫(84%对48%)和其他蠕虫(48%对43%,微小膜壳绦虫除外,为49%对61%)的检测比麦克马斯特法更敏感。至于虫卵计数,Mini-FLOTAC FS2报告微小膜壳绦虫每克粪便中有904个虫卵(EPG)(麦克马斯特法为457个,加藤厚涂片法为111个),蛔虫为1177个EPG(加藤厚涂片法为1315个,麦克马斯特法为995个);FS2检测到的微小膜壳绦虫和蛔虫的EPG均最高(分别为904对568和1177对643),差异无统计学意义。计算了技术可行性:加藤厚涂片法平均每个样本用时48分钟,Mini-FLOTAC法为13分钟/样本,麦克马斯特法为7分钟/样本。然而,特别是对于加藤厚涂片法和Mini-FLOTAC法,处理多个样本时平均时间(分钟/样本)显著减少。

结论

Mini-FLOTAC是一种很有前景的蠕虫诊断技术,它对微小膜壳绦虫的检测比加藤厚涂片法和麦克马斯特法更敏感,对蛔虫鉴定的敏感性与加藤厚涂片法相同且比麦克马斯特法更敏感。虫卵计数差异虽有相关性,但未达到统计学意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d87/4074144/941062265460/1756-3305-7-271-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验