Suppr超能文献

用于对从新鲜且天然受污染的香菜中鉴定出的肠炎沙门氏菌进行特征分析的聚合酶链反应(PCR)血清分型检测法、沙门氏菌Check&Trace检测法以及Luminex沙门氏菌血清分型检测法的比较

Comparison of a PCR serotyping assay, Check&Trace assay for Salmonella, and Luminex Salmonella serotyping assay for the characterization of Salmonella enterica identified from fresh and naturally contaminated cilantro.

作者信息

Jean-Gilles Beaubrun J, Ewing L, Jarvis K, Dudley K, Grim C, Gopinath G, Flamer M-L, Auguste W, Jayaram A, Elmore J, Lamont M, McGrath T, Hanes D E

机构信息

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD 20708, United States.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD 20708, United States.

出版信息

Food Microbiol. 2014 Sep;42:181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

Abstract

Salmonella enterica isolated from fresh cilantro samples collected through the USDA/AMS Microbiological Data Program (MDP) were used to compare a PCR serotyping assay against the Check&Trace assay and the Luminex (BioPlex) Salmonella serotyping assay. The study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the three methods for serotyping Salmonella from both enrichment broth cultures and pure Salmonella cultures. In this investigation, Salmonella spp. serotyping was conducted using 24 h enrichment broth cultures and pure Salmonella cultures from cilantro samples, with the PCR serotyping assay. Conversely, the Check&Trace and Luminex for Salmonella assays required pure cultures for Salmonella serotyping. The cilantro samples contained S. enterica serovar Montevideo, Newport, Saintpaul, and Tennessee, identified by the PCR serotyping assay and Check&Trace for Salmonella, but the Luminex assay only identified two of the four serotypes of the cilantro samples. The anticipated impact from this study is that the PCR serotyping assay provides a time- and cost-effective means for screening, identifying and serotyping Salmonella using DNA extracted from 24 h enrichment cilantro samples.

摘要

从美国农业部/农产品营销服务局微生物数据项目(MDP)收集的新鲜香菜样本中分离出的肠炎沙门氏菌,用于比较一种PCR血清分型检测方法与Check&Trace检测方法以及Luminex(BioPlex)沙门氏菌血清分型检测方法。开展这项研究是为了评估这三种方法从增菌肉汤培养物和纯沙门氏菌培养物中对沙门氏菌进行血清分型的有效性。在这项调查中,使用来自香菜样本的24小时增菌肉汤培养物和纯沙门氏菌培养物,通过PCR血清分型检测方法对沙门氏菌属进行血清分型。相反,Check&Trace和Luminex沙门氏菌检测方法需要纯培养物来进行沙门氏菌血清分型。香菜样本中含有肠炎沙门氏菌血清型蒙得维的亚、纽波特、圣保罗和田纳西,通过PCR血清分型检测方法和Check&Trace沙门氏菌检测方法鉴定出来,但Luminex检测方法仅鉴定出香菜样本四种血清型中的两种。这项研究预期的影响是,PCR血清分型检测方法提供了一种省时且经济高效的手段,可利用从24小时增菌香菜样本中提取的DNA对沙门氏菌进行筛查、鉴定和血清分型。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验