Hancock Jacqueline, Rosen Joshua, Moreno Amy, Kim Anthony W, Detterbeck Frank C, Boffa Daniel J
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Aug;98(2):424-32; discussion 432. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.04.067. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
Clinical stage IIIA (cStage IIIA) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resulting from mediastinal lymph node disease (stage IIIA-cN2) represents one of the more challenging lung cancer scenarios. Not only is the prognosis disappointing but the accuracy of mediastinal staging is uncertain, the optimal treatment approach is unclear, and the outcomes are variable. In attempt to assess the current state of clinical stage IIIA-cN2 NSCLC in the United States, we examined this controversial cohort in the largest clinical database resource available, the National Cancer Database (NCDB).
The NCDB was queried for patients diagnosed between 1999 and 2011 with NSCLC, clinically staged to have mediastinal lymph node metastases but not systemic metastases (T1-3, N2, M0, cStage IIIA).
A total of 83,913 cSstage IIIA NSCLC patients with presumed or confirmed mediastinal lymph node metastases were identified. Clinical staging of the mediastinum was variable, as lymph nodes were only biopsied in 23% of patients who were treated without surgery, and in surgical patients clinical N2 status was pathologically confirmed in only 56% of treatment naïve patients. The most common treatment approach was nonsurgical, involving chemotherapy, radiation, or both (69% of patients) followed by surgery (14%). The 5-year survival varied by treatment and was highest for patients treated with surgery in combination with chemotherapy, radiation, or both (38%), followed by surgery alone (30%), nonsurgical treatment (11%), and worst for untreated patients (5%).
There is cause for concern over the accuracy of the clinical staging of the mediastinum among cStage IIIA-cN2 patients in the United States. The use of surgery is relatively low but is associated with an encouraging 5-year survival. Further study is needed to clarify the accuracy of mediastinal staging in the United States for cStage IIIA-cN2 NSCLC.
因纵隔淋巴结疾病导致的临床 IIIA 期(cStage IIIA)非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)(IIIA - cN2 期)是肺癌中较具挑战性的情况之一。不仅预后令人失望,而且纵隔分期的准确性不确定,最佳治疗方法不明确,治疗结果也存在差异。为了评估美国临床 IIIA - cN2 期 NSCLC 的现状,我们在最大的临床数据库资源——国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中研究了这一有争议的队列。
在 NCDB 中查询 1999 年至 2011 年间诊断为 NSCLC、临床分期为有纵隔淋巴结转移但无全身转移(T1 - 3,N2,M0,cStage IIIA)的患者。
共识别出 83913 例推定或确诊有纵隔淋巴结转移的 cStage IIIA NSCLC 患者。纵隔的临床分期存在差异,因为在未接受手术治疗的患者中,仅 23% 的患者进行了淋巴结活检,而在接受手术的患者中,初治患者的临床 N2 状态仅在 56% 的患者中得到病理证实。最常见的治疗方法是非手术治疗,包括化疗、放疗或两者联合(69% 的患者),其次是手术治疗(14%)。5 年生存率因治疗方式而异,接受手术联合化疗、放疗或两者的患者生存率最高(38%),其次是单纯手术(30%)、非手术治疗(11%),未治疗患者生存率最差(5%)。
美国 cStage IIIA - cN2 期患者纵隔临床分期的准确性令人担忧。手术的使用率相对较低,但 5 年生存率令人鼓舞。需要进一步研究以明确美国 cStage IIIA - cN2 NSCLC 纵隔分期的准确性。