COHERE, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Aug;114:138-50. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.058. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
A growing number of studies across different fields are making use of a new class of choice models, labelled variably as hybrid model structures or integrated choice and latent variable models, and incorporating the role of attitudes in decision making. To date, this technique has not been used in health economics. The present paper looks at the formation of such attitudes and their role in patients' treatment choices in the context of low back pain. We use stated choice data collected from a sample of 561 patients with 348 respondents referred to a regional spine centre in Middelfart, Denmark in spring/summer 2012. We show how the hybrid model structure is able to make a link between attitudinal questions and treatment choices, and also explains variation of these attitudes across key socio-demographic groups. However, we also show how, in this case, only a small share of the overall heterogeneity is linked to the latent attitude construct. Despite their growing popularity, the key findings of the advanced model, despite a greater insight into the drivers of attitudes and small gains in efficiency, are no different from standard approaches which remain easier to apply.
越来越多不同领域的研究开始使用一类新型的选择模型,这些模型被不同地标记为混合模型结构或综合选择和潜在变量模型,并纳入了态度在决策中的作用。迄今为止,这种技术尚未在健康经济学中使用。本文着眼于这种态度的形成及其在腰痛背景下患者治疗选择中的作用。我们使用 2012 年春季/夏季从丹麦米德尔法特地区的一个脊柱中心招募的 561 名患者的样本中收集的陈述选择数据。我们展示了混合模型结构如何在态度问题和治疗选择之间建立联系,以及如何解释这些态度在关键社会人口统计学群体中的变化。然而,我们也展示了在这种情况下,只有一小部分整体异质性与潜在的态度结构有关。尽管这些高级模型越来越受欢迎,但尽管对态度驱动因素有了更深入的了解,并且在效率上略有提高,但它们与标准方法没有什么不同,标准方法仍然更容易应用。