Hum Factors. 2014 May;56(3):592-604. doi: 10.1177/0018720813495279.
This study tested the effects of two fundamental forms of distraction, including visual-manual and cognitive-audio distraction, with comparison under both operational and tactical driving. Strategic control remains for future study.
Driving is a complex control task involving operational, tactical, and strategic control. Although operational control, such as lead-car following, has been studied, the influence of in-vehicle distractions on higher levels of control, including tactical and strategic, remains unclear.
Two secondary tasks were designed to independently represent visual-manual and cognitive-audio distractions, based on multiple resource theory. Drivers performed operational vehicle control maneuvers (lead-car following) or tactical control maneuvers (passing) along with the distraction tasks in a driving simulator. Response measures included driving performance and visual behavior.
Results revealed drivers' ability to accommodate either visual or cognitive distractions in following tasks but not in passing. The simultaneous distraction condition led to the greatest decrement in performance.
Findings support the need to assess the impacts of in-vehicle distraction on different levels of driving control. Future study should investigate driver distraction under strategic control.
本研究测试了两种基本形式的分心,包括视觉-手动和认知-听觉分心,并在操作和战术驾驶下进行了比较。战略控制将留待未来研究。
驾驶是一项复杂的控制任务,涉及操作、战术和战略控制。尽管已经研究了操作控制,例如前车跟随,但车内分心对包括战术和战略在内的更高层次控制的影响仍不清楚。
基于多资源理论,设计了两个次要任务来分别代表视觉-手动和认知-听觉分心。驾驶员在驾驶模拟器中执行操作车辆控制动作(前车跟随)或战术控制动作(超车),同时执行分心任务。响应措施包括驾驶性能和视觉行为。
结果表明,驾驶员能够适应跟随任务中的视觉或认知分心,但不能适应超车任务。同时分心的情况导致了性能的最大下降。
研究结果支持评估车内分心对不同层次驾驶控制的影响的必要性。未来的研究应在战略控制下调查驾驶员分心。