• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者终末期肾病治疗的费用。

The charges for ESRD treatment of diabetics.

作者信息

Smith D G, Harlan L C, Hawthorne V M

机构信息

Department of Health Services, Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(2):111-8. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90084-x.

DOI:10.1016/0895-4356(89)90084-x
PMID:2493073
Abstract

To evaluate the differential charges for treating end-stage renal disease (ESRD) associated with diabetes mellitus, Medicare billing data are analyzed. The charges of 244 patients in the Michigan Kidney Registry identified as having (ESRD) from diabetes are compared with charges of 902 nondiabetic patients. Average annual charges for ESRD treatment for diabetics are +29,671 (+/- 27,662) which are +4695 (+/- 1344) higher than charges for nondiabetics. The majority of the difference (84.3%) is attributable to higher inpatient hospital charges. Most of the remainder (14.5%) is attributable to higher physician and medical supply charges. Charges for treatment of diabetics are higher on all modalities of treatment, but differences are not significant among modalities.

摘要

为评估治疗与糖尿病相关的终末期肾病(ESRD)的差异费用,对医疗保险计费数据进行了分析。将密歇根肾脏登记处确定患有糖尿病性ESRD的244例患者的费用与902例非糖尿病患者的费用进行比较。糖尿病患者ESRD治疗的平均年费用为29,671美元(±27,662美元),比非糖尿病患者的费用高出4695美元(±1344美元)。差异的大部分(84.3%)归因于较高的住院医院费用。其余大部分(14.5%)归因于较高的医生和医疗用品费用。糖尿病患者在所有治疗方式上的治疗费用都较高,但各治疗方式之间的差异不显著。

相似文献

1
The charges for ESRD treatment of diabetics.糖尿病患者终末期肾病治疗的费用。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(2):111-8. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90084-x.
2
Treatment strategies for insulin-dependent diabetics with ESRD: a cost-effectiveness decision analysis model.终末期肾病胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者的治疗策略:一种成本效益决策分析模型
Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 May;31(5):794-802. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(98)70048-4.
3
Payment of USA physicians for dialysis care.
Perit Dial Int. 2004 Nov-Dec;24(6):518-20.
4
A comparison of charges for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and center hemodialysis.持续性非卧床腹膜透析与中心血液透析费用的比较。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(9):817-24. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90097-2.
5
End-stage renal disease-associated managed care costs among patients with and without diabetes.患有和未患糖尿病的患者中与终末期肾病相关的管理式医疗费用。
Diabetes Care. 2004 Dec;27(12):2829-35. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.12.2829.
6
Comparison of treatment costs between dialysis and transplantation.透析与移植治疗成本的比较。
Semin Nephrol. 1992 May;12(3):284-9.
7
Changing risk factor demographics in end-stage renal disease patients entering hemodialysis and the impact on long-term mortality.进入血液透析的终末期肾病患者风险因素人口统计学的变化及其对长期死亡率的影响。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1990 May;15(5):422-32. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)70360-8.
8
The economic cost of ESRD, vascular access procedures, and Medicare spending for alternative modalities of treatment. USRDS. United States Renal Data System.终末期肾病(ESRD)的经济成本、血管通路手术以及替代治疗方式的医疗保险支出。美国肾脏数据系统(USRDS)。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1997 Aug;30(2 Suppl 1):S160-77. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90187-6.
9
The organization and financing of kidney dialysis and transplant care in the United States of America.美利坚合众国肾脏透析及移植护理的组织与资金筹集情况。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2007 Dec;7(4):301-18. doi: 10.1007/s10754-007-9019-6.
10
Prospective analysis of global costs for maintenance of patients with ESRD.对终末期肾病患者维持治疗的全球成本进行前瞻性分析。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Jul;42(1):12-21. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(03)00404-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Direct costs associated with chronic kidney disease among type 2 diabetic patients in India.印度2型糖尿病患者慢性肾病的直接成本。
Indian J Nephrol. 2014 May;24(3):141-7. doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.132000.
2
Diabetes mellitus and the St Vincent Declaration. The economic implications.糖尿病与《圣文森特宣言》。经济影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Apr;7(4):292-307. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199507040-00004.