Suppr超能文献

验证马里兰综合病理学指数(MAPI),这是一种预测移植结果的植入前评分系统。

Validation of the Maryland Aggregate Pathology Index (MAPI), a pre-implantation scoring system that predicts graft outcome.

作者信息

Philosophe Benjamin, Malat Gregory E, Soundararajan Sunganthi, Barth Rolf N, Manitpisikul Wana, Wilson Nikita S, Ranganna Karthik, Drachenberg Cinthia B, Papadimitriou John C, Neuman Brian P, Munivenkatappa Raghava B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2014 Aug;28(8):897-905. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12400. Epub 2014 Jul 8.

Abstract

Predicting graft outcome after renal transplantation based on donor histological features has remained elusive and is subject to institutional variability. We have shown in a retrospective study that the Maryland Aggregate Pathology Index score reliably predicts graft outcome. We sought to validate the scoring system in our center and a second transplant center. We analyzed 140 deceased donor kidneys pre-implantation biopsies from center 1 and 65 from center 2. The patients had a mean follow-up of 695 ± 424 and 656 ± 305 d respectively. Although MAPI scores were similar, there were significant differences in donor and recipient parameters between both centers. Despite this, MAPI was predictive of graft outcome for both centers by Cox univariate, multivariate and time dependent ROC analysis. For center 1 and 2, three yr graft survival within each MAPI group was statistically equivalent. The three-yr graft survival at center 1 for low, intermediate, and high MAPI groups were 84.3%, 56.5%, and 50.0%, respectively, p ≤ 0.0001, and at center 2 were 83.3%, 33.3%, and 33.3%, p = 0.006. MAPI, which is based on a pre-implantation biopsy, demonstrated similar predictive and outcome results from both centers. As expanded criteria donors (ECD) criteria have redefined marginal kidneys, MAPI has the potential to further define ECD kidneys, increase utilization, and ultimately improve outcomes.

摘要

基于供体组织学特征预测肾移植后的移植物结局一直难以实现,且存在机构间差异。我们在一项回顾性研究中表明,马里兰综合病理学指数评分能够可靠地预测移植物结局。我们试图在我们中心和另一个移植中心验证该评分系统。我们分析了中心1的140例尸体供肾植入前活检样本以及中心2的65例样本。患者的平均随访时间分别为695±424天和656±305天。尽管MAPI评分相似,但两个中心在供体和受体参数方面存在显著差异。尽管如此,通过Cox单变量、多变量和时间依赖性ROC分析,MAPI对两个中心的移植物结局均具有预测性。对于中心1和中心2,每个MAPI组内的3年移植物存活率在统计学上相当。中心1低、中、高MAPI组的3年移植物存活率分别为84.3%、56.5%和50.0%(p≤0.0001),中心2分别为83.3%、33.3%和33.3%(p = 0.006)。基于植入前活检的MAPI在两个中心显示出相似的预测结果和结局。随着扩大标准供体(ECD)标准重新定义了边缘肾脏,MAPI有潜力进一步界定ECD肾脏,提高利用率,并最终改善结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验