Bulf Hermann, Macchi Cassia Viola, de Hevia Maria Dolores
Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Université Paris-Descartes, Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, CNRS, UMR 8242, Paris, France; Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, NeuroSpin, INSERM, U992, Gif sur Yvette, France.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 16;9(6):e99499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099499. eCollection 2014.
A number of studies have shown strong relations between numbers and oriented spatial codes. For example, perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention depending upon numbers' magnitude, in a way suggestive of a spatially oriented, mental representation of numbers. Here, we investigated whether this phenomenon extends to non-symbolic numbers, as well as to the processing of the continuous dimensions of size and brightness, exploring whether different quantitative dimensions are equally mapped onto space. After a numerical (symbolic Arabic digits or non-symbolic arrays of dots; Experiment 1) or a non-numerical cue (shapes of different size or brightness level; Experiment 2) was presented, participants' saccadic response to a target that could appear either on the left or the right side of the screen was registered using an automated eye-tracker system. Experiment 1 showed that, both in the case of Arabic digits and dot arrays, right targets were detected faster when preceded by large numbers, and left targets were detected faster when preceded by small numbers. Participants in Experiment 2 were faster at detecting right targets when cued by large-sized shapes and left targets when cued by small-sized shapes, whereas brightness cues did not modulate the detection of peripheral targets. These findings indicate that looking at a symbolic or a non-symbolic number induces attentional shifts to a peripheral region of space that is congruent with the numbers' relative position on a mental number line, and that a similar shift in visual attention is induced by looking at shapes of different size. More specifically, results suggest that, while the dimensions of number and size spontaneously map onto an oriented space, the dimension of brightness seems to be independent at a certain level of magnitude elaboration from the dimensions of spatial extent and number, indicating that not all continuous dimensions are equally mapped onto space.
多项研究表明数字与定向空间编码之间存在紧密联系。例如,感知数字会根据数字大小引起注意力的空间转移,这暗示了数字在空间上定向的心理表征。在此,我们研究了这种现象是否扩展到非符号数字,以及大小和亮度等连续维度的处理,探讨不同的定量维度是否同样映射到空间上。在呈现一个数字(符号阿拉伯数字或非符号点阵;实验1)或一个非数字线索(不同大小或亮度水平的形状;实验2)之后,使用自动眼动追踪系统记录参与者对可能出现在屏幕左侧或右侧的目标的眼跳反应。实验1表明,无论是对于阿拉伯数字还是点阵,当大数字在前时,右侧目标被检测得更快,而当小数字在前时,左侧目标被检测得更快。实验2中的参与者在被大尺寸形状提示时检测右侧目标更快,在被小尺寸形状提示时检测左侧目标更快,而亮度线索并未调节外周目标的检测。这些发现表明,查看符号或非符号数字会引起注意力转移到与数字在心理数字线上的相对位置一致的空间外周区域,并且查看不同大小的形状也会引起类似的视觉注意力转移。更具体地说,结果表明,虽然数字和大小维度会自发地映射到一个定向空间,但亮度维度在一定程度的量级加工上似乎与空间范围和数字维度无关,这表明并非所有连续维度都同样映射到空间上。