• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

空间数字对应编码(SNARC)效应受中央执行控制调节:在基于线索的三分任务中揭示。

SNARC effect modulated by central executive control: revealed in a cue-based trisection task.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, 330022, China.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2021 Sep;85(6):2223-2236. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01407-z. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-020-01407-z
PMID:32869153
Abstract

People respond to small numbers faster with the left hand and respond to large numbers faster with the right hand, a phenomenon known as the Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effect. Whether the SNARC effect originates from culturally determined long-term experience or the task-set-influenced temporary associations among spaces, locations, and numerical magnitudes in working memory (WM) is still controversial. In the present study, we used a trisection paradigm in which numbers were divided into three categories (small: 1, 2; middle: 4, 5, 6; and large: 8, 9) to explore whether the central executive control can modulate the SNARC effect. Participants were serially presented with a cue and a target number. The cue denoted a task rule, which informed participants to compare the target number with either 3 or 7. The cue was either switched or repeated across trials. We found that the SNARC effects were observed in the cue-switching condition. In the cue-repeat condition, the SNARC effect disappeared. These findings suggest that the SNARC effect is modulated by set-shifting-related central executive control in WM, supporting the view that the SNARC effect is WM-dependent.

摘要

人们用左手对小数字的反应更快,用右手对大数字的反应更快,这种现象被称为空间-数字反应代码关联(SNARC)效应。SNARC 效应是源于文化决定的长期经验,还是工作记忆(WM)中空间、位置和数值大小之间受任务集影响的临时关联,这仍然存在争议。在本研究中,我们使用了三分法范式,其中数字被分为三类(小:1,2;中:4,5,6;大:8,9),以探讨中央执行控制是否可以调节 SNARC 效应。参与者依次呈现提示和目标数字。提示表示任务规则,告知参与者将目标数字与 3 或 7 进行比较。提示在试验中要么切换,要么重复。我们发现,在提示切换条件下观察到了 SNARC 效应。在提示重复条件下,SNARC 效应消失。这些发现表明,SNARC 效应受到 WM 中与定势转移相关的中央执行控制的调节,支持了 SNARC 效应依赖于 WM 的观点。

相似文献

1
SNARC effect modulated by central executive control: revealed in a cue-based trisection task.空间数字对应编码(SNARC)效应受中央执行控制调节:在基于线索的三分任务中揭示。
Psychol Res. 2021 Sep;85(6):2223-2236. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01407-z. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
2
The role of cognitive control in the SNARC effect: A review.认知控制在 SNARC 效应中的作用:综述。
Psych J. 2022 Dec;11(6):792-803. doi: 10.1002/pchj.586. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
3
Mechanism of the SNARC Effect in Numerical Magnitude, Time Sequence, and Spatial Sequence Tasks: Involvement of LTM and WM.数字大小、时间顺序和空间顺序任务中SNARC效应的机制:长时记忆和工作记忆的参与
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 21;9:1558. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01558. eCollection 2018.
4
On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.关于健康人类数字表征与空间注意力交互作用的不稳定性和制约因素:文献综述及新实验证据简述
Prog Brain Res. 2016;227:223-56. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.04.023. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
5
Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.用于反应选择的左右编码对比不一定必须与数字特征对比相关联才能产生SNARC效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102887. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102887. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
6
Development of number-space associations: SNARC effects and spatial attention in 7- to 11-year-olds.数-空间联系的发展:7 至 11 岁儿童的 SNARC 效应与空间注意。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 12;14(3):e0212204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212204. eCollection 2019.
7
A working memory account of the interaction between numbers and spatial attention.数字与空间注意力交互作用的工作记忆模型
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(8):1500-13. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.903984. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
8
Mirror numbers activate quantity representations, but show no SNARC effect: A working memory explanation.镜像数字激活数量表征,但不显示SNARC效应:一种工作记忆解释。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Apr;49(4):465-482. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001090. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
9
Shifting attention does not influence numerical processing.转移注意力不会影响数字处理。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Nov;82(8):3920-3930. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02112-0.
10
Does the spatial-numerical association of response codes effect depend on digits' relative or absolute magnitude? Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task.反应编码的空间-数字关联效应是否取决于数字的相对大小或绝对大小?来自知觉方向判断任务的证据。
J Gen Psychol. 2018 Oct-Dec;145(4):415-430. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2018.1532391. Epub 2018 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of cognitive control in the interaction of the SNARC and MARC effects.认知控制在SNARC效应和MARC效应交互作用中的作用。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 17;13(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02692-2.
2
Number, size, and space associated in a common system by distinct mechanisms.数量、大小和空间通过不同机制在一个通用系统中相互关联。
Psychol Res. 2024 Dec 5;89(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02052-6.
3
Probing the Dual-Route Model of the SNARC Effect by Orthogonalizing Processing Speed and Depth.通过正交化加工速度和深度探究 SNARC 效应的双通道模型。

本文引用的文献

1
Automaticity in processing spatial-numerical associations: Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task of Arabic digits in frames.数字在框架中呈现时的知觉方位判断任务:来自空间-数字自动关联加工的证据
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 24;15(2):e0229130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229130. eCollection 2020.
2
How does number magnitude influence temporal and spatial parameters of eye movements?数字大小如何影响眼球运动的时空间参数?
Exp Brain Res. 2020 Jan;238(1):101-109. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05701-0. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
3
Factoring in the spatial effects of symbolic number representation.
Exp Psychol. 2023 Jan;70(1):1-13. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000577.
4
Processing stage flexibility of the SNARC effect: Task relevance or magnitude relevance?SNARC 效应的加工阶段灵活性:任务相关性还是大小相关性?
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 10;13:1022999. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1022999. eCollection 2022.
5
Perception of the temporal order of digits during rapid serial visual presentation is influenced by their ordinality.在快速连续视觉呈现期间,对数字的时间顺序的感知受到其顺序的影响。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jul;87(5):1537-1548. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01760-1. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
考虑符号数字表示的空间效应。
Biol Psychol. 2020 Jan;149:107782. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107782. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
4
The influence of semantic processing and response latency on the SNARC effect.语义加工和反应潜伏期对SNARC效应的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 May;196:75-86. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
5
The SNARC and MARC effects measured online: Large-scale assessment methods in flexible cognitive effects.在线测量的 SNARC 和 MARC 效应:灵活认知效应的大规模评估方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Aug;51(4):1676-1692. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01213-5.
6
Multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitudes? Evidence from left spatial neglect.数字大小的多种从左到右的空间表征?来自左侧空间忽视的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Apr;237(4):1031-1043. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05483-5. Epub 2019 Feb 9.
7
Spatial-numerical association of response code effect as a window to mental representation of magnitude in long-term memory among Hebrew-speaking children.空间-数字反应代码关联效应作为希伯来语儿童长期记忆中数量心理表象的窗口。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 May;181:102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
8
A mental number line in human newborns.人类新生儿的心理数字线。
Dev Sci. 2019 Nov;22(6):e12801. doi: 10.1111/desc.12801. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
9
Non-symbolic magnitudes are represented spatially: Evidence from a non-symbolic SNARC task.非符号数量在空间上是有表示的:来自非符号 SNARC 任务的证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 30;13(8):e0203019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203019. eCollection 2018.
10
Time dependency of the SNARC effect for different number formats: evidence from saccadic responses.不同数字形式的 SNARC 效应的时间依赖性:来自眼跳反应的证据。
Psychol Res. 2019 Oct;83(7):1485-1495. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1010-y. Epub 2018 Apr 9.