• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解与衡量学生在学校的参与度:一项来自12个国家的国际研究结果

Understanding and measuring student engagement in school: the results of an international study from 12 countries.

作者信息

Lam Shui-Fong, Jimerson Shane, Wong Bernard P H, Kikas Eve, Shin Hyeonsook, Veiga Feliciano H, Hatzichristou Chryse, Polychroni Fotini, Cefai Carmel, Negovan Valeria, Stanculescu Elena, Yang Hongfei, Liu Yi, Basnett Julie, Duck Robert, Farrell Peter, Nelson Brett, Zollneritsch Josef

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

Department of Counseling, Clinical, and School Psychology, University of California.

出版信息

Sch Psychol Q. 2014 Jun;29(2):213-232. doi: 10.1037/spq0000057.

DOI:10.1037/spq0000057
PMID:24933218
Abstract

The objective of the present study was to develop a scale that is appropriate for use internationally to measure affective, behavioral, and cognitive dimensions of student engagement. Psychometric properties of this scale were examined with data of 3,420 students (7th, 8th, and 9th grade) from 12 countries (Austria, Canada, China, Cyprus, Estonia, Greece, Malta, Portugal, Romania, South Korea, the United Kingdom, and the United States). The intraclass correlation of the full-scale scores of student engagement between countries revealed that it was appropriate to aggregate the data from the 12 countries for further analyses. Coefficient alphas revealed good internal consistency. Test-retest reliability coefficients were also acceptable. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the data fit well to a second-order model with affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement as the first-order factors and student engagement as the second-order factor. The results support the use of this scale to measure student engagement as a metaconstruct. Furthermore, the significant correlations of the scale with instructional practices, teacher support, peer support, parent support, emotions, academic performance, and school conduct indicated good concurrent validity of the scale. Considerations and implications regarding the international use of this student engagement in school measure are discussed.

摘要

本研究的目的是开发一种适用于国际范围的量表,以测量学生参与度的情感、行为和认知维度。使用来自12个国家(奥地利、加拿大、中国、塞浦路斯、爱沙尼亚、希腊、马耳他、葡萄牙、罗马尼亚、韩国、英国和美国)的3420名学生(七年级、八年级和九年级)的数据,对该量表的心理测量特性进行了检验。各国学生参与度全量表得分的组内相关性表明,将12个国家的数据汇总进行进一步分析是合适的。系数阿尔法显示出良好的内部一致性。重测信度系数也可以接受。验证性因素分析表明,数据很好地拟合了一个二阶模型,其中情感、行为和认知参与度为一阶因素,学生参与度为二阶因素。结果支持使用该量表来测量作为一个元结构的学生参与度。此外,该量表与教学实践、教师支持、同伴支持、家长支持、情绪、学业成绩和学校行为之间的显著相关性表明该量表具有良好的同时效度。讨论了在国际上使用这种学校学生参与度测量方法的注意事项和影响。

相似文献

1
Understanding and measuring student engagement in school: the results of an international study from 12 countries.理解与衡量学生在学校的参与度:一项来自12个国家的国际研究结果
Sch Psychol Q. 2014 Jun;29(2):213-232. doi: 10.1037/spq0000057.
2
Cultural universality and specificity of student engagement in school: The results of an international study from 12 countries.学生在学校参与度的文化普遍性与特殊性:一项来自12个国家的国际研究结果
Br J Educ Psychol. 2016 Mar;86(1):137-53. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12079. Epub 2015 May 22.
3
Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries.男孩和女孩是否认为自己在学校里的参与度一样高?来自 12 个国家的一项国际研究的结果。
J Sch Psychol. 2012 Feb;50(1):77-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
4
A confirmatory factor analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students in a Chinese sample.乌得勒支学生工作投入量表在中国样本中的验证性因素分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Feb;49:129-134. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.017. Epub 2016 Nov 26.
5
Development of the great recess framework - observational tool to measure contextual and behavioral components of elementary school recess.大课间框架的发展——一种用于测量小学课间时间的情境和行为组成部分的观察工具。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Mar 22;18(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5295-y.
6
Measuring school climate in high schools: a focus on safety, engagement, and the environment.高中学校氛围的测量:聚焦安全、参与度与环境。
J Sch Health. 2014 Sep;84(9):593-604. doi: 10.1111/josh.12186.
7
Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of the Student School Engagement Measure.学生学校参与度测量的聚合和区别效度的证据。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Sep;26(3):806-814. doi: 10.1037/a0036277. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
8
Development and psychometric evidence of the Academic Engagement Scale (USAES) in Mexican college students.发展与心理计量证据的学术参与量表(USAES)在墨西哥大学生。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 20;18(12):e0288012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288012. eCollection 2023.
9
Delaware School Climate Survey-Student: its factor structure, concurrent validity, and reliability.特拉华州学校气候调查-学生:其因素结构、同时效度和信度。
J Sch Psychol. 2011 Apr;49(2):157-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
10
School engagement of children in early grades: Psychometric, and gender comparisons.儿童在低年级的学校参与度:心理测量学和性别比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 27;14(11):e0225542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225542. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Building a triadic model of technology, motivation, and engagement: a mixed-methods study of AI teaching assistants in design theory education.构建技术、动机与参与的三元模型:设计理论教育中人工智能教学助手的混合方法研究
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 2;16:1624182. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1624182. eCollection 2025.
2
Different associations of parental involvement with children's learning of Chinese, English, and math: a three-wave longitudinal study.父母参与与孩子中文、英文和数学学习的不同关联:一项三波次纵向研究。
Eur J Psychol Educ. 2023;38(1):269-285. doi: 10.1007/s10212-022-00605-0. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
3
Identification of intimate partner violence from free text descriptions in social media.
从社交媒体中的自由文本描述中识别亲密伴侣暴力行为。
J Comput Soc Sci. 2022 Nov;5(2):1207-1233. doi: 10.1007/s42001-022-00166-8. Epub 2022 May 7.
4
Exploring Students Online Learning Behavioral Engagement in University: Factors, Academic Performance and Their Relationship.探索大学生在线学习行为参与度:影响因素、学业成绩及其关系
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 17;15(1):78. doi: 10.3390/bs15010078.
5
Migraine and cognitive dysfunction: a narrative review.偏头痛与认知功能障碍:一篇叙述性综述
J Headache Pain. 2024 Dec 19;25(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01923-y.
6
Leveraging learning science to improve student outcomes in asynchronous online medical terminology education.利用学习科学提高异步在线医学术语教育中学生的学习成果。
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2413051. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2413051. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
7
Effects of perceived teacher support on online language learners' engagement.教师支持感对在线语言学习者参与度的影响。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 7;10(15):e35679. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35679. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
8
Predictors of academic engagement of high school students: academic socialization and motivational beliefs.高中生学业参与度的预测因素:学业社会化与动机信念。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 25;15:1347163. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1347163. eCollection 2024.
9
Much more than just being present: participation of children with intellectual disabilities in mainstream schools.远不止于身处其中:智障儿童在主流学校的参与情况。
Int J Dev Disabil. 2022 Dec 6;70(5):833-848. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2022.2152161. eCollection 2024.
10
Ecobehavioural analysis of academic engagement of children with intellectual disabilities in Chinese mainstream schools.中国主流学校中智障儿童学业参与的生态行为分析
Int J Dev Disabil. 2022 Dec 19;70(5):904-914. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2022.2156065. eCollection 2024.