Int J Phytoremediation. 2014;16(7-12):1104-18. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2013.821445.
Maize, sunflower,flax, and spinach differed in the accumulation of Cd when grown on a Cd contaminated soil. This was mainly due to the different Cd net influx, In, that varied among species by a factor of up to 30. The objective of this study was to find possible reasons for the different Cd In by using a mechanistic model. After 14 days of Cd uptake the model calculated only a small Cd depletion at the root surface, e.g. from 0.22 mumol L(-1) down to 0.19 mumol L(-1) for maize and from 0.48 mumol L(-1) down to 0.35 mumol L(-1)for spinach. Even so the model always overestimated the Cd I(n), for spinach by a factor of 1.5 and for maize by a factor of 10. Only simulating a decrease of C(Li) or the root absorbing power, alpha, by 40% to 90% gave an agreement of calculated and measured I(n),. This may be interpreted as that about 40% in the case of spinach and 90% in the case of maize of the Cd in soil solution were not accessible for plant uptake. The high sensitivity to alpha also shows that not the Cd transport to the root but alpha was limiting the step for Cd uptake.
当在受镉污染的土壤上种植玉米、向日葵、亚麻和菠菜时,它们在镉的积累上存在差异。这主要是由于不同物种的镉净流入量 In 不同,其差异高达 30 倍。本研究的目的是通过使用一种机械模型来寻找导致不同 Cd In 的可能原因。在 14 天的镉吸收后,该模型仅计算出在根表面有少量的镉耗竭,例如,玉米从 0.22µmol/L 下降到 0.19µmol/L,菠菜从 0.48µmol/L 下降到 0.35µmol/L。即便如此,该模型总是高估了 Cd In,对于菠菜是 1.5 倍,对于玉米是 10 倍。只有模拟 C(Li)或根吸收能力α降低 40%到 90%,才能使计算出的和测量出的 I(n)相吻合。这可以解释为,在菠菜中约有 40%、在玉米中约有 90%的土壤溶液中的镉无法被植物吸收。对 α 的高敏感性也表明,限制镉吸收步骤的不是镉向根的运输,而是 α。