Suppr超能文献

心脏再同步治疗中的膈神经刺激

Phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

作者信息

Moubarak Ghassan, Bouzeman Abdeslam, Ollitrault Jacky, Anselme Frederic, Cazeau Serge

机构信息

Department of Pacing and Interventional Electrophysiology, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185, rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France,

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Oct;41(1):15-21. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9917-8. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

Abstract

In cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the electrical impulse delivered by the left ventricular (LV) lead may incidentally cause phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS). The purpose of this state-of-the-art review is to describe the frequency, risk factors, and clinical consequences of PNS and to present the most recent options to successfully manage PNS. PNS occurs in 2 to 37% of implanted patients and is not always detected in the supine position during implantation. Lateral and posterior veins are at higher risk of PNS than anterior veins, and apical positions are at higher risk of PNS than basal positions. The management of PNS discovered during implantation may include mapping the course of the target vein in order to find a PNS-free site, targeting another vein if available, and pacing with alternative configurations before changing the lead location. Non-invasive options for management of post-operative PNS depend on the difference between PNS and LV stimulation thresholds and include reducing the LV pacing output, automatic determination of LV stimulation threshold and minimal output delivery by the device, increasing the pulse duration, and electronic repositioning. New quadripolar leads allow to pace from different cathodes, and the multiple pacing configurations available have proved superior to bipolar leads in mitigating PNS. This electronic repositioning addresses almost all of the clinically relevant PNS and should markedly reduce the need for invasive lead repositioning or CRT abandon, which is actually the last option for 2% of patients.

摘要

在心脏再同步治疗(CRT)中,左心室(LV)导联传递的电冲动可能会偶然引起膈神经刺激(PNS)。本综述旨在描述PNS的发生率、危险因素和临床后果,并介绍成功处理PNS的最新方法。PNS发生在2%至37%的植入患者中,在植入过程中仰卧位时并不总是能检测到。外侧和后侧静脉发生PNS的风险高于前侧静脉,心尖位置发生PNS的风险高于基底部位置。植入过程中发现的PNS的处理方法可能包括绘制目标静脉的走行以找到无PNS的部位、如有可用的其他静脉则选择该静脉、以及在改变导联位置之前采用替代配置进行起搏。术后PNS的非侵入性处理方法取决于PNS与LV刺激阈值之间的差异,包括降低LV起搏输出、自动确定LV刺激阈值以及设备的最小输出递送、增加脉冲持续时间和电子重新定位。新型四极导联允许从不同阴极进行起搏,已证明可用的多种起搏配置在减轻PNS方面优于双极导联。这种电子重新定位几乎解决了所有临床上相关的PNS问题,并应显著减少侵入性导联重新定位或放弃CRT的必要性,而这实际上是2%患者的最后选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验