• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏再同步治疗四极起搏导线的单中心经验

Single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

作者信息

Vado Antonello, Menardi Endrj, Rossetti Guido, Ballari Gianpaolo, Feola Mauro, Bobbio Marco

机构信息

EP Lab, Ospedale S.Croce e Carle, Via Coppino 26, 12100, Cuneo, Italy,

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Mar;39(2):161-5. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9849-8. Epub 2013 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10840-013-9849-8
PMID:24293178
Abstract

AIM

Recent studies have shown that a quadripolar left ventricular (LV) lead can result in low rates of dislocation and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) acutely and on medium-term follow-up in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We evaluated the outcomes of CRT patients in whom a quadripolar LV lead was implanted in our institution.

METHODS

We studied 45 consecutive heart failure patients (75 % men; age, 70.3 ± 9.0 years) following successful implantation of a quadripolar LV lead. Demographic and clinical data were collected preoperatively, and patients were followed up for 18.9 months.

RESULTS

The implantation success rate was 100 %. Mean overall duration was 100.1 ± 34.6 min, and X-ray exposure time was 13.20 ± 13.5 min. The most distal effective pacing site was used as the final pacing configuration in all patients. Acute dislodgment requiring reoperation occurred before discharge in three cases (6.6 %). Six patients (13 %) suffered PNS during follow-up; we solved this problem by changing the stimulation vector. Three months after implantation, a mean of six out of ten effective sites (threshold <2.5 V at 1.5 ms, no PNS) per patient was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the relatively long term, the quadripolar LV lead was associated with excellent pacing thresholds and low rates of dislocation and PNS.

摘要

目的

近期研究表明,在心脏再同步治疗(CRT)中,四极左心室(LV)导线在急性和中期随访时可导致较低的脱位率和膈神经刺激(PNS)发生率。我们评估了在我们机构植入四极LV导线的CRT患者的治疗结果。

方法

我们研究了45例连续的心力衰竭患者(75%为男性;年龄70.3±9.0岁),这些患者成功植入了四极LV导线。术前收集人口统计学和临床数据,并对患者进行了18.9个月的随访。

结果

植入成功率为100%。平均总时长为100.1±34.6分钟,X线暴露时间为13.20±13.5分钟。所有患者均将最远端有效起搏部位用作最终起搏配置。3例患者(6.6%)在出院前发生急性脱位需要再次手术。6例患者(13%)在随访期间出现PNS;我们通过改变刺激向量解决了这个问题。植入后3个月,每位患者平均记录到十个有效部位中的六个(在1.5毫秒时阈值<2.5V,无PNS)。

结论

在相对较长的时间内,四极LV导线具有出色的起搏阈值以及较低的脱位率和PNS发生率。

相似文献

1
Single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗四极起搏导线的单中心经验
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Mar;39(2):161-5. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9849-8. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
2
Clinical and procedural outcome of patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead: early results of a prospective multicenter study.四极左心室导线植入患者的临床和操作结果:一项前瞻性多中心研究的早期结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2012 Nov;9(11):1822-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
3
Effectiveness and Reliability of Selected Site Pacing for Avoidance of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in CRT Patients with Quadripolar LV Leads: The EffaceQ Study.四极左心室导线CRT患者中用于避免膈神经刺激的选定部位起搏的有效性和可靠性:EffaceQ研究
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Aug;38(8):942-50. doi: 10.1111/pace.12664. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
4
Performance of a novel left ventricular lead with short bipolar spacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: primary results of the Attain Performa quadripolar left ventricular lead study.用于心脏再同步治疗的新型短双极间距左心室导线的性能:Attain Performa四极左心室导线研究的主要结果
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Apr;12(4):751-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.019. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
5
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivered Via a Multipolar Left Ventricular Lead is Associated with Reduced Mortality and Elimination of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Follow-Up from a Multicenter Registry.通过多极左心室导线进行心脏再同步治疗与降低死亡率及消除膈神经刺激相关:来自多中心注册研究的长期随访
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 May;26(5):540-6. doi: 10.1111/jce.12625. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
6
Improved implant and postoperative lead performance in CRT-D patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. A 6-month follow-up analysis from a multicenter prospective comparative study.植入四极左心室导线的心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)患者的植入物及术后导线性能改善。一项多中心前瞻性对比研究的6个月随访分析。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Jan;42(1):59-66. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9956-1. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
7
Performance and clinical comparison between left ventricular quadripolar and bipolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Observational research.心脏再同步治疗中左心室四极和双极导线的性能及临床比较:观察性研究
Indian Heart J. 2018 Nov-Dec;70(6):864-871. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 16.
8
Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes.新型四极经静脉心脏再同步治疗左心室起搏导线:与传统植入术结果前瞻性比较的早期结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2011 Jan;8(1):31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.09.076. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
9
Use of a quadripolar left ventricular lead to achieve successful implantation in patients with previous failed attempts at cardiac resynchronization therapy.使用四极左心室导联在先前心脏再同步治疗失败的患者中实现成功植入。
Europace. 2011 Jul;13(7):992-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur032. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
10
Long-term follow-up of patients with a quadripolar active fixation left ventricular lead: An Italian multicenter experience.四极主动固定左心室导线患者的长期随访:意大利多中心经验。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Jul;33(7):1567-1575. doi: 10.1111/jce.15574. Epub 2022 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The Loop Technique in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study.心脏再同步治疗中的环路技术:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Aug 26;17:3711-3717. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S482227. eCollection 2024.
2
Clinical outcome of left ventricular multipoint pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.左心室多点起搏与传统双心室起搏在心脏再同步治疗中的临床疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart Fail Rev. 2018 Nov;23(6):927-934. doi: 10.1007/s10741-018-9737-5.
3
Optimizing CRT - Do We Need More Leads and Delivery Methods.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical and procedural outcome of patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead: early results of a prospective multicenter study.四极左心室导线植入患者的临床和操作结果:一项前瞻性多中心研究的早期结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2012 Nov;9(11):1822-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
2
First prospective, multi-centre clinical experience with a novel left ventricular quadripolar lead.首例新型左心室四极导线的前瞻性、多中心临床经验
Europace. 2012 Mar;14(3):365-72. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur322. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
3
Without a quadripolar left ventricular lead you don't succeed: a challenging case of phrenic nerve stimulation.
优化心脏再同步治疗——我们是否需要更多电极导线和输送方法。
J Atr Fibrillation. 2015 Apr 30;7(6):1202. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1202. eCollection 2015 Apr-May.
4
Improved implant and postoperative lead performance in CRT-D patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. A 6-month follow-up analysis from a multicenter prospective comparative study.植入四极左心室导线的心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)患者的植入物及术后导线性能改善。一项多中心前瞻性对比研究的6个月随访分析。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Jan;42(1):59-66. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9956-1. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
5
Phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗中的膈神经刺激
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Oct;41(1):15-21. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9917-8. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
没有四极左心室导线你就无法成功:一例具有挑战性的膈神经刺激病例。
Int J Cardiol. 2012 Mar 8;155(2):e37-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.07.032.
4
Elimination of phrenic nerve stimulation occurring during CRT: follow-up in patients implanted with a novel quadripolar pacing lead.心脏再同步治疗期间膈神经刺激的消除:植入新型四极起搏导线患者的随访
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012 Jan;33(1):43-9. doi: 10.1007/s10840-011-9598-5. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
5
New generation of transvenous left ventricular leads - first experience with implantation of multipolar left ventricular leads.新一代经静脉左心室导线——多极左心室导线植入的首次经验。
Exp Clin Cardiol. 2011 Spring;16(1):23-6.
6
Initial single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗四极起搏导线的初步单中心经验。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Apr;34(4):484-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.03003.x. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
7
Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for mild-to-moderate heart failure.心脏再同步治疗轻中度心力衰竭。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 16;363(25):2385-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009540. Epub 2010 Nov 14.
8
Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes.新型四极经静脉心脏再同步治疗左心室起搏导线:与传统植入术结果前瞻性比较的早期结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2011 Jan;8(1):31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.09.076. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
9
Influence of pacing configurations, body mass index, and position of coronary sinus lead on frequency of phrenic nerve stimulation and pacing thresholds under cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗中起搏方式、体重指数、冠状窦导线位置对膈神经刺激频率和起搏阈值的影响。
Europace. 2010 Jul;12(7):961-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq119. Epub 2010 May 5.
10
Impact of segmental left ventricle lead position on cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes.节段性左心室导线位置对心脏再同步治疗结局的影响。
Heart Rhythm. 2010 May;7(5):639-44. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.01.035. Epub 2010 Feb 1.