Suppr超能文献

一种重度结节性痤疮的治疗方法:一项比较固定剂量阿达帕林/过氧化苯甲酰加多西环素与口服异维 A 酸的随机、研究者设盲、对照、非劣效性试验。

A treatment for severe nodular acne: a randomized investigator-blinded, controlled, noninferiority trial comparing fixed-dose adapalene/benzoyl peroxide plus doxycycline vs. oral isotretinoin.

机构信息

University of Western Ontario and Windsor Clinical Research Inc., 2224 Walker Rd. Suite 300, Windsor, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2014 Dec;171(6):1508-16. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13191. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral isotretinoin (ISO) is the gold standard for severe nodular acne. However, as some patients are unwilling or unable to take, or are intolerant to, ISO, other options are needed.

OBJECTIVES

To compare efficacy and safety of oral ISO vs. doxycycline 200 mg plus adapalene 0·1%/benzoyl peroxide 2·5% gel (D+A/BPO) in severe nodular acne over 20 weeks.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, randomized, controlled, noninferiority investigator-blinded study involving 266 subjects.

RESULTS

D+A/BPO showed a significantly earlier onset of action in reducing nodules, papules/pustules and total lesions at week 2. ISO was superior in reducing nodules (95·6% vs. 88·7%), papules/pustules (95·2% vs. 79·6%) and total lesions (92·9% vs. 78·2%; all P < 0·01) at week 20. Half as many subjects for D+A/BPO compared with ISO had treatment-related, medically relevant adverse events (33 events in 18·0% of subjects vs. 73 in 33·8% of subjects, respectively). D+A/BPO was noninferior to ISO in the intent-to-treat population [95% confidence interval (CI) -2·7 to 20·8 (P = 0·13); 63·9% vs. 54·9% of subjects, respectively] and per-protocol population [95% CI 3·9-28·6 (P = 0·01); 74·3% vs. 58% of subjects, respectively), based on the composite efficacy/safety end point.

CONCLUSIONS

D+A/BPO showed a favourable composite efficacy/safety profile compared with ISO. This combination is an alternative to ISO in patients intolerant to, or unable or unwilling to take, oral ISO, and is an option for treatment of severe nodular acne.

摘要

背景

口服异维 A 酸(ISO)是治疗严重结节性痤疮的金标准。然而,由于一些患者不愿意或不能服用 ISO,或者对其不耐受,因此需要其他选择。

目的

比较口服 ISO 与多西环素 200 mg 加阿达帕林 0.1%/过氧苯甲酰 2.5%凝胶(D+A/BPO)治疗严重结节性痤疮的疗效和安全性,疗程为 20 周。

方法

这是一项多中心、随机、对照、非劣效性、研究者设盲研究,共纳入 266 例患者。

结果

D+A/BPO 组在第 2 周时开始降低结节、丘疹脓疱和总皮损数的作用更早,在第 2 周时减少结节(95.6%比 88.7%)、丘疹脓疱(95.2%比 79.6%)和总皮损(92.9%比 78.2%;所有 P < 0.01)的效果更优。与 ISO 相比,D+A/BPO 组有更少的治疗相关、医学上相关的不良事件(33 例,18.0%;73 例,33.8%)。在意向治疗人群中(95%置信区间 -2.7 至 20.8,P = 0.13)和符合方案人群中(95%置信区间 3.9 至 28.6,P = 0.01),D+A/BPO 均不劣于 ISO,基于复合疗效/安全性终点。

结论

与 ISO 相比,D+A/BPO 显示出良好的复合疗效/安全性特征。对于不能耐受、不能服用或不愿意服用口服 ISO 的患者,该联合治疗是 ISO 的替代方案,也是治疗严重结节性痤疮的一种选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验