Antoñanzas Fernando, Rodríguez-Ibeas Roberto, Juárez-Castelló Carmelo A
Departamento de Economía y Empresa, University of La Rioja, Cigüeña 60, 26004-Logroño, Spain.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Oct;14(5):617-26. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.927315. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
This paper acknowledges the difficulties of providing access to innovative drugs in some jurisdictions under the patent system and it contributes to the current debate on mechanisms aimed at facilitating such access. We employ a highly stylized static model of two markets (North and South) to analyse the conditions under which a new system based on royalty payments would be preferred to a patent system for pharmaceuticals. In the welfare calculations we have considered explicitly the influence of marketing activities by the patent owner as well as the shadow price of public funds needed to finance the royalties. The bargaining power of the firm in terms of obtaining higher compensation is also considered. The result: are not unambiguously conclusive being heavily dependent on the relevant values of the parameters. Nevertheless, it seems that for realistic parameter values, the new system could be preferred by all the parties involved.
本文认识到在专利制度下,某些司法管辖区在获取创新药物方面存在困难,并为当前有关旨在促进这种获取的机制的辩论做出了贡献。我们采用了一个高度程式化的两个市场(北方和南方)的静态模型,来分析在哪些条件下,基于特许权使用费的新制度会比药品专利制度更受青睐。在福利计算中,我们明确考虑了专利所有者营销活动的影响以及为特许权使用费融资所需公共资金的影子价格。还考虑了企业在获得更高补偿方面的议价能力。结果:并非明确无疑地具有决定性,很大程度上取决于参数的相关值。然而,对于现实的参数值而言,新制度似乎可能受到所有相关方的青睐。