Suppr超能文献

评估在线协作话语。

Assessing Online Collaborative Discourse.

作者信息

Breen Henny

机构信息

Linfield College Good Samaritan School of Nursing, Portland, OR.

出版信息

Nurs Forum. 2015 Oct-Dec;50(4):218-27. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12091. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This qualitative study using transcript analysis was undertaken to clarify the value of Harasim's Online Collaborative Learning Theory as a way to assess the collaborative process within nursing education. The theory incorporated three phases: (a) idea generating; (b) idea organizing; and (c) intellectual convergence.

METHOD

The transcripts of asynchronous discussions from a 2-week module about disaster nursing using a virtual community were analyzed and formed the data for this study.

FINDINGS

This study supports the use of Online Collaborative Learning Theory as a framework for assessing online collaborative discourse. Individual or group outcomes were required for the students to move through all three phases of the theory.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The phases of the Online Collaborative Learning Theory could be used to evaluate the student's ability to collaborate. It is recommended that group process skills, which have more to do with interpersonal skills, be evaluated separately from collaborative learning, which has more to do with cognitive skills. Both are required for practicing nurses. When evaluated separately, the student learning needs are more clearly delineated.

摘要

目的

本项采用转录分析的定性研究旨在阐明哈拉西姆在线协作学习理论作为评估护理教育中协作过程方法的价值。该理论包含三个阶段:(a)想法生成;(b)想法组织;以及(c)知识汇聚。

方法

对使用虚拟社区进行的为期两周的灾难护理模块异步讨论的文字记录进行分析,并形成本研究的数据。

结果

本研究支持将在线协作学习理论用作评估在线协作话语的框架。学生要经历该理论的所有三个阶段,需要有个人或小组成果。

讨论/结论:在线协作学习理论的各个阶段可用于评估学生的协作能力。建议将更多与人际技能相关的小组过程技能与更多与认知技能相关的协作学习分开评估。执业护士需要这两者。分开评估时,学生的学习需求会更清晰地显现出来。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验