• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进和阻碍健康科学高等教育中在线小组作业的因素:范围综述。

Facilitators and barriers to online group work in higher education within health sciences - a scoping review.

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Division for Research, Development and University Library, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2341508. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2341508. Epub 2024 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1080/10872981.2024.2341508
PMID:38608002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11018044/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In health education, group work is essential to prepare students for working in health care and medical teams. Following the widespread adoption of online teaching, group work increasingly takes place in online environments. Although successful group work can provide good learning outcomes, it is unclear what facilitates or hinders online group work in health science education, and to what extent this topic has been addressed. Thus, this scoping review aimed to identify the facilitators and barriers to online group work in higher health education, provide an overview of the scientific literature related to the topic, and identify knowledge gaps in the research.

METHODS

This scoping review was guided by the methodological framework described by Arksey and O'Malley, and reporting is in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR). Eight online databases were searched for scientific articles published between 2012 and 2022. At least two researchers independently screened records and full-text articles and charted data including article characteristics and key information related to the research question. Findings were categorized and summarized based on the Community of Inquiry Framework.

RESULTS

After screening 3671 records and 466 full-text articles, 39 articles met the inclusion criteria. The review revealed smaller group size, consistency in group composition and joint responsibility to be facilitators. Challenges with group communication, scheduling synchronous meetings and technical issues were identified as barriers. Our findings supported the importance of all three elements of the Community of Inquiry Framework: social, cognitive, and teaching presence.

CONCLUSION

This review provides an overview of facilitators and barriers to online group work in health science education. However, there is a need for further investigation of these factors and studies addressing this topic from the teachers' perspective.

摘要

简介

在健康教育中,小组工作对于培养学生在医疗保健和医疗团队中的工作能力至关重要。随着在线教学的广泛采用,小组工作越来越多地在在线环境中进行。尽管成功的小组工作可以带来良好的学习成果,但在线健康科学教育中促进小组工作的因素和阻碍因素是什么,以及这个主题在多大程度上得到了探讨,目前还不清楚。因此,本范围界定综述旨在确定高等健康教育中在线小组工作的促进因素和障碍因素,概述与该主题相关的科学文献,并确定研究中的知识空白。

方法

本范围界定综述遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley 描述的方法框架,并按照系统评价和元分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)进行报告。在 2012 年至 2022 年期间,从 8 个在线数据库中搜索了科学文章。至少有两名研究人员独立筛选记录和全文文章,并记录包括文章特征和与研究问题相关的关键信息在内的数据。根据“ Inquiry 社区框架”对研究结果进行分类和总结。

结果

在筛选了 3671 条记录和 466 篇全文文章后,有 39 篇文章符合纳入标准。综述结果表明,小组规模较小、组成一致性和共同责任是促进因素。小组沟通、安排同步会议和技术问题方面的挑战被确定为障碍。我们的研究结果支持“ Inquiry 社区框架”的所有三个要素的重要性:社会、认知和教学存在。

结论

本综述提供了高等健康教育中在线小组工作的促进因素和障碍因素概述。然而,需要进一步调查这些因素,并从教师的角度探讨这个主题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b09/11018044/5d5a5d6c48a7/ZMEO_A_2341508_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b09/11018044/9077c507dd0a/ZMEO_A_2341508_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b09/11018044/5d5a5d6c48a7/ZMEO_A_2341508_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b09/11018044/9077c507dd0a/ZMEO_A_2341508_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b09/11018044/5d5a5d6c48a7/ZMEO_A_2341508_F0002_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Facilitators and barriers to online group work in higher education within health sciences - a scoping review.促进和阻碍健康科学高等教育中在线小组作业的因素:范围综述。
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2341508. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2341508. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Identifying facilitators and barriers to culturally responsive communication for racial, ethnic, sexual, and gender minoritized patients when screened for COVID-19 vaccinations: A scoping review protocol.确定在为 COVID-19 疫苗接种筛查时针对少数族裔、种族、性别和性少数患者进行文化响应沟通的促进因素和障碍:范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0290514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290514. eCollection 2023.
5
Identifying the barriers and facilitators to culturally responsive HIV and PrEP screening for racial, ethnic, sexual, and gender minoritized patients: A scoping review protocol.确定针对少数族裔、种族、性和性别少数群体患者进行文化响应的 HIV 和 PrEP 筛查的障碍和促进因素:范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2023 May 24;18(5):e0281173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281173. eCollection 2023.
6
Simulation-Based Learning Supported by Technology to Enhance Critical Thinking in Nursing Students: Protocol for a Scoping Review.技术支持的基于模拟的学习以增强护生批判性思维:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Apr 4;11(4):e36725. doi: 10.2196/36725.
7
Public Transport Accessibility for People With Disabilities: Protocol for a Scoping Review.残疾人的公共交通可达性:范围审查方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 28;12:e43188. doi: 10.2196/43188.
8
Internet use and adolescent development in rural China: A scoping review protocol of research landscape and gaps.**标题**:互联网使用与中国农村青少年发展:研究现状与差距的范围综述方案 **摘要**:背景:互联网的普及对青少年的生活产生了深远的影响。中国农村地区的互联网使用情况和青少年发展的研究相对较少。目的:本次范围综述旨在全面了解中国农村地区互联网使用与青少年发展之间的关系。方法:我们将检索 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、维普网和万方数据库,以获取关于中国农村地区互联网使用与青少年发展的研究。我们还将追溯纳入研究的参考文献,并联系相关研究人员以获取未发表的研究数据。两名评审员将独立筛选文献、提取数据并评估纳入研究的质量。我们将采用描述性方法对研究进行分析,并使用主题分析方法来综合研究结果。结果:预计研究将涵盖不同年龄段的青少年,包括小学生、初中生和高中生。研究设计将包括横断面研究、队列研究和干预研究等。研究将涉及互联网使用的各种方面,如社交媒体使用、在线学习、网络游戏等。主要结局指标将包括青少年的心理社会发展、学业成绩、网络成瘾等。结论:本研究将提供关于中国农村地区互联网使用与青少年发展之间关系的全面概述,并为制定相关政策和干预措施提供参考。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 11;19(9):e0308229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308229. eCollection 2024.
9
Provider- and Patient-Related Barriers to and Facilitators of Digital Health Technology Adoption for Hypertension Management: Scoping Review.高血压管理中数字健康技术采用的提供者和患者相关障碍及促进因素:范围审查
JMIR Cardio. 2019 Mar 26;3(1):e11951. doi: 10.2196/11951.
10
Suicidal behaviours and moderator support in online health communities: protocol for a scoping review.自杀行为和在线健康社区中的调节支持:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 20;10(1):e034162. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034162.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of community of inquiry and self-efficacy on student attitudes in sustained remote health professions learning environments.探究社区和自我效能对远程持续卫生专业学习环境中学生态度的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 28;23(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04382-2.
2
Online group projects in higher education: persistent challenges and implications for practice.高等教育中的在线小组项目:持续存在的挑战及对实践的启示
J Comput High Educ. 2023 Mar 24:1-34. doi: 10.1007/s12528-023-09360-7.
3
Medical and pharmacy students' perspectives of remote synchronous interprofessional education sessions.
医学和药学专业学生对远程同步跨专业教育课程的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 10;22(1):611. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03675-2.
4
Perceived positive social interdependence in online versus face-to-face team-based learning styles of collaborative learning: a randomized, controlled, mixed-methods study.在线与面对面团队合作学习模式下的协作学习中感知到的积极的社会相互依存关系:一项随机对照混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 23;22(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03633-y.
5
Learning team-based quality improvement in a virtual setting: a qualitative study.在虚拟环境中学习基于团队的质量改进:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 21;12(6):e061390. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061390.
6
The impact of synchronous hybrid instruction on students' engagement in a pharmacotherapy course.同步混合式教学对学生参与药物治疗课程的影响。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2022 Jan-Mar;20(1):2611. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2022.1.2611. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
7
Utility and Acceptability of a Peer Assessment Rubric to Improve Interprofessional Learning.同伴评估量表在提升跨专业学习中的效用和可接受性。
J Nurs Educ. 2022 Apr;61(4):213-216. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20211128-07. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
8
Nursing students' perceptions of online learning and its impact on knowledge level.护理专业学生对在线学习的认知及其对知识水平的影响。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 May;112:105327. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105327. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
9
What characterize high and low achieving teams in Interprofessional education: A self-determination theory perspective.高成就和低成就的跨专业教育团队有什么特点:从自我决定理论的角度看。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 May;112:105321. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105321. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
10
Collaborative learning in small groups in an online course - a case study.在线课程中小小组协作学习:一个案例研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 10;22(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03232-x.