• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[对先前失败部位更换牙种植体的临床回顾性分析]

[A clinical retrospective analysis of dental implants replaced in previously failed sites].

作者信息

He Jing, Shang Ya-wei, Deng Chun-fu, Shang De-hao, Zhang Chong, Wang Dan-ning, Zhao Bao-hong

机构信息

Center of Implant Dentistry, School of Stomatology, China Medical University; Laboratory of Implant Dentistry, Liaoning Institute of Dental Research. Shenyang 110002, Liaoning Province, China.E-mail:

出版信息

Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2014 Apr;23(2):196-200.

PMID:24935843
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes as well as related factors of dental implants replaced in previously failed sites.

METHODS

A total of 12 patients (15 implants) who received replacement in previously failed sites during January 2005 to December 2011 were included. Outcomes of redo-implants were collected and clinical data was recorded and analyzed regarding risk factors related to redo-implants' survival using SPSS13.0 software package.

RESULTS

The survival rate of redo-implants was 100% [(33.5±15.4) months]. The mean redo-implant diameter (4.5±0.6) mm was significantly larger than the previous one (4.1±0.7) mm (P<0.05). The mean survival time of implants placed for the first time was (12.9±15.9) months. Implant replacement occurred (6.8±4.4) months after original implant removal. No significant influence was observed on patient and implant-related factors as well as surgery and prosthesis-dependent factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Reimplantation in previously failed site is considered as one of feasible prosthesis plans, and surgeons ought to get enough confidence to achieve satisfactory implant survival rates. Supported by Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation (20092093), Liaoning Provincial Science and Technology Foundation (2012225090), and Shenyang Science and Technology Foundation (F11-264-1-25, F12-277-1-18).

摘要

目的

评估在先前种植失败部位进行牙种植修复的临床效果及相关影响因素。

方法

纳入2005年1月至2011年12月期间在先前种植失败部位接受种植修复的12例患者(共15枚种植体)。收集再次种植体的修复效果,记录临床资料,并使用SPSS13.0软件包分析与再次种植体存留相关的危险因素。

结果

再次种植体的存留率为100%[(33.5±15.4)个月]。再次种植体的平均直径(4.5±0.6)mm显著大于先前种植体(4.1±0.7)mm(P<0.05)。首次种植体的平均存留时间为(12.9±15.9)个月。再次种植在原种植体拔除后(6.8±4.4)个月进行。未观察到患者、种植体相关因素以及手术和修复相关因素产生显著影响。

结论

在先前种植失败部位再次种植被认为是可行的修复方案之一,外科医生应具备足够信心以获得满意的种植体存留率。本研究受辽宁省自然科学基金(20092093)、辽宁省科技基金(2012225090)及沈阳市科技基金(F11 - 264 - 1 - 25,F12 - 277 - 1 - 18)资助。

相似文献

1
[A clinical retrospective analysis of dental implants replaced in previously failed sites].[对先前失败部位更换牙种植体的临床回顾性分析]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2014 Apr;23(2):196-200.
2
Dental implants placed in previously failed sites: survival rate and factors affecting the outcome.种植于先前失败部位的牙种植体:生存率及影响预后的因素。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Mar;19(3):259-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01466.x. Epub 2008 Jan 3.
3
Success and survival of single dental implants placed in sites of previously failed implants.植入于先前种植失败部位的单颗牙种植体的成功率及存留情况。
J Periodontol. 2007 Sep;78(9):1670-4. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060516.
4
Intermediate long-term clinical performance of dental implants placed in sites with a previous early implant failure: a retrospective analysis.在先前早期种植失败部位植入的牙种植体的中长期临床性能:一项回顾性分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Dec;26(12):1443-9. doi: 10.1111/clr.12485. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
5
A retrospective analysis of replacing dental implants in previously failed sites.对先前失败部位的牙种植体进行替换的回顾性分析。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Sep;114(3):290-3. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.07.010. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
6
Clinical and Retrospective Evaluation of 4.1- or 4.3-mm-Diameter Implants Placed Immediately in the Molar Region: A Preliminary Study.4.1毫米或4.3毫米直径种植体即刻植入磨牙区的临床及回顾性评估:一项初步研究
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Mar;74(3):489-96. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.10.017. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
7
Risk factors and reoperative survival rate of failed narrow-diameter implants in the maxillary anterior region.上颌前区窄径种植体失败的风险因素和再次手术生存率。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Feb;22(1):29-41. doi: 10.1111/cid.12867. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
8
Retrospective analysis of 56 edentulous dental arches restored with 344 single-stage implants using an immediate loading fixed provisional protocol: statistical predictors of implant failure.对采用即刻负重固定临时修复方案用344颗单阶段种植体修复的56个无牙牙弓进行回顾性分析:种植体失败的统计学预测因素
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):823-30.
9
Successive Reimplantation of Dental Implants Into Sites of Previous Failure.将牙种植体连续重新植入先前失败的部位。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Mar;78(3):375-385. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
10
A long-term retrospective analysis of survival rates of implants in the mandible.下颌骨种植体存活率的长期回顾性分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):1348-54. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3910.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival rate of implants performed at sites of previously failed implants and factors associated with failure: A retrospective investigation.在先前种植失败部位进行种植的存活率及与失败相关的因素:一项回顾性研究。
J Dent Sci. 2024 Jul;19(3):1741-1747. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.10.012. Epub 2023 Oct 22.
2
Dental Reimplantation Treatment and Clinical Care for Patients with Previous Implant Failure-A Retrospective Study.《既往种植体失败患者的牙再植入治疗及临床护理:一项回顾性研究》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 29;19(23):15939. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315939.
3
Retrospective clinical study of ultrawide implants more than 6 mm in diameter.
直径大于6毫米的超宽种植体的回顾性临床研究。
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Aug 5;38(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40902-016-0075-z. eCollection 2016 Dec.